Literature DB >> 10682205

The time course of phonological, semantic, and orthographic coding in reading: evidence from the fast-priming technique.

H W Lee1, K Rayner, A Pollatsek.   

Abstract

The present experiment employed the fast-priming paradigm in reading (Sereno & Rayner, 1992), in which sentences are silently read while eye-movement-contingent changes are made on a specified target region. In this paradigm, when readers fixate on a specified target word region, a prime word is encountered for a brief duration at the beginning of the fixation and then it is replaced by a target word. Three types of primes were employed: homophones, semantically related, and orthographically similar, and five prime durations were employed: 29, 32, 35, 38, and 41 msec. The primary finding was that significant homophone priming was obtained at prime durations ranging from 29 to 35 msec, whereas significant semantic priming occurred only at the 32-msec prime duration. In contrast, significant orthographic priming occurred at all prime durations. These findings indicate that phonological codes are activated during an eye fixation at least as rapidly as semantic codes. An explanation for the pattern of events is suggested using the framework of an activation-verification model.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10682205     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  Y A Lee; K S Binder; J O Kim; A Pollatsek; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; M Lesch; R K Morris; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis.

Authors:  D L Share
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1999-02

4.  Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words.

Authors:  M F Lesch; A Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Phonological codes and eye movements in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A Pollatsek; K S Binder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

7.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; J C Johnston; B L Hale
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Resolution of lexical ambiguity: evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm.

Authors:  S C Sereno
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06

10.  Lexical access and the spelling-to-sound regularity effect.

Authors:  D W Bauer; K E Stanovich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-09
View more
  16 in total

1.  Orthographic and phonological computation in visual word recognition: evidence from backward masking in Hebrew.

Authors:  R Frost; O Yogev
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Phonological representation of words in working memory during sentence reading.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Cynthia Connie; Brianna Eiter; Ralph Radach; Dieter Heller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

Review 3.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Does conal prime CANAL more than cinal? Masked phonological priming effects in Spanish with the lexical decision task.

Authors:  Alexander Pollatsek; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

5.  Feature and conjunction effects in recognition memory: toward specifying familiarity for compound words.

Authors:  Todd C Jones; Alan S Brown; Paul Atchley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

6.  Skilled readers begin processing sub-phonemic features by 80 ms during visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Lisa D Sanders; John Kingston
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Phonological and orthographic overlap effects in fast and masked priming.

Authors:  Steven Frisson; Nathalie N Bélanger; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Combined ERP/fMRI evidence for early word recognition effects in the posterior inferior temporal gyrus.

Authors:  Joseph Dien; Eric S Brian; Dennis L Molfese; Brian T Gold
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: evidence for a speech-like phonological representation.

Authors:  Brianna M Eiter; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.