Literature DB >> 10680618

Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

.   

Abstract

This review addresses the issue of mechanical ultrasound-induced bioeffects in the presence of gas carrier contrast agents (GCAs). Here, the term "contrast agent" refers to those agents that provide ultrasound contrast by being composed of microbubbles, encapsulated or not, containing one or more gases. Provided in this section are summaries on how contrast agents work, some of their current uses, and the potential for bioeffects associated with their presence in an ultrasonic field.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10680618      PMCID: PMC2041884          DOI: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.2.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  366 in total

1.  The effects of the microbubble suspension SH U 454 (Echovist) on ultrasound-induced cell lysis in a rotating tube exposure system.

Authors:  A R Williams; G Kubowicz; E Cramer; R Schlief
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.724

2.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  In vitro detection of cavitation induced by a diagnostic ultrasound system.

Authors:  C K Holland; R A Roy; R E Apfel; L A Crum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast angiography in monochorionic twin fetuses.

Authors:  M L Denbow; M J Blomley; D O Cosgrove; N M Fisk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Sonographic investigation of the uterus during artificial uterine cavity distention.

Authors:  J van Roessel; K Wamsteker; N Exalto
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 0.910

6.  Thresholds for ultrasonically induced lung hemorrhage in neonatal swine.

Authors:  R Baggs; D P Penney; C Cox; S Z Child; C H Raeman; D Dalecki; E L Carstensen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Further evidence of gaseous embolic material in patients with artificial heart valves.

Authors:  D Georgiadis; R W Baumgartner; R Karatschai; A Lindner; H R Zerkowski
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Evidence for ultrasonically induced cavitation in vivo.

Authors:  G R ter Haar; S Daniels
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Successful left ventricular opacification following peripheral venous injection of sonicated contrast agent: an experimental evaluation.

Authors:  M W Keller; S B Feinstein; D D Watson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound with carbon dioxide microbubbles as adjunct to arteriography of liver tumors.

Authors:  A Veltri; S Capello; B Faissola; F Spalluto; S Farinet; M Grosso
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  5 in total

1.  Vascular lesions and s-thrombomodulin concentrations from auricular arteries of rabbits infused with microbubble contrast agent and exposed to pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  James F Zachary; James P Blue; Rita J Miller; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Lesions of ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage are not consistent with thermal injury.

Authors:  James F Zachary; James P Blue; Rita J Miller; Brian J Ricconi; J Gary Eden; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Inactivation of Planktonic Escherichia coli by Focused 2-MHz Ultrasound.

Authors:  Andrew A Brayman; Brian E MacConaghy; Yak-Nam Wang; Keith T Chan; Wayne L Monsky; Anna J McClenny; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Contrast Ultrasound Imaging of the Aorta Does Not Affect Progression of Atherosclerosis or Cardiovascular Biomarkers in ApoE-/- Mice.

Authors:  Brendon W Smith; Douglas G Simpson; Sandhya Sarwate; Rita J Miller; John W Erdman; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  In vivo study of enhanced chemotherapy combined with ultrasound image-guided focused ultrasound (USgFUS) treatment for pancreatic cancer in a xenograft mouse model.

Authors:  Eun-Joo Park; Yun Deok Ahn; Jae Young Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.