Literature DB >> 10672095

Patients' perceptions of seclusion: a qualitative investigation.

T Meehan1, C Vermeer, C Windsor.   

Abstract

Twelve patients receiving acute in-patient psychiatric care in Queensland, Australia, participated in semi-structured interviews to elicit their perceptions of seclusion. All respondents had experienced time in seclusion within the 7 days prior to interview. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using content analysis. Five major themes emerged: use of seclusion, emotional impact, sensory deprivation, maintaining control and staff-patient interaction. The prevailing negativity towards seclusion underscores the need for ongoing critical review of its use. In particular, the relationship between patient responses to seclusion and the circumstances in which seclusion takes place requires greater consideration. Interventions such as providing information to patients about seclusion, increased interaction with patients during seclusion, attention to privacy and effective debriefing following seclusion may help to reduce the emotional impact of the practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10672095     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01289.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  14 in total

1.  Understanding Mental Health Service User Experiences of Restraint Through Debriefing: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Ling; Kristin Cleverley; Athina Perivolaris
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Is there an alternative to seclusion or mechanical restraint?

Authors:  Branimir Margetić; Branka Aukst-Margetić; Adela Matusin
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007

3.  Patients' perspectives on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) aftercare attendance: qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Irina Moroshko; Leah Brennan; Narelle Warren; Wendy Brown; Paul O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Listening to the Patient Perspective: Psychiatric Inpatients' Attitudes Towards Physical Restraint.

Authors:  Yaniv Spinzy; Saed Maree; Aviv Segev; Gadi Cohen-Rappaport
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2018-09

5.  Variables Associated With the Subjective Experience of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Inpatients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilera-Serrano; Jose Guzman-Parra; Juan A Garcia-Sanchez; Berta Moreno-Küstner; Fermin Mayoral-Cleries
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  Alternatives to seclusion and restraint in psychiatry and in long-term care facilities for the elderly: perspectives of service users and family members.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Marie Desmartis; Mylène Tantchou Dipankui; Johanne Gagnon; Michèle St-Pierre
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Consumers and Carer perspectives on poor practice and the use of seclusion and restraint in mental health settings: results from Australian focus groups.

Authors:  Lisa M Brophy; Catherine E Roper; Bridget E Hamilton; Juan José Tellez; Bernadette M McSherry
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2016-02-06

8.  East London Modified-Broset as Decision-Making Tool to Predict Seclusion in Psychiatric Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Felice Loi; Karl Marlowe
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  "Coercion Experience Scale" (CES)--validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures.

Authors:  Jan Bergk; Erich Flammer; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 10.  Methodological and ethical challenges in studying patients' perceptions of coercion: a systematic mixed studies review.

Authors:  Päivi Soininen; Hanna Putkonen; Grigori Joffe; Jyrki Korkeila; Maritta Välimäki
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.