Literature DB >> 29046647

East London Modified-Broset as Decision-Making Tool to Predict Seclusion in Psychiatric Intensive Care Units.

Felice Loi1, Karl Marlowe2,3.   

Abstract

Seclusion is a last resort intervention for management of aggressive behavior in psychiatric settings. There is no current objective and practical decision-making instrument for seclusion use on psychiatric wards. Our aim was to test the predictive and discriminatory characteristics of the East London Modified-Broset (ELMB), to delineate its decision-making profile for seclusion of adult psychiatric patients, and second to benchmark it against the psychometric properties of the Broset Violence Checklist (BVC). ELMB, an 8-item modified version of the 6-item BVC, was retrospectively employed to evaluate the seclusion decision-making process on two Psychiatric Intensive Care Units (patients n = 201; incidents n = 2,187). Data analyses were carried out using multivariate regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Predictors of seclusion were: physical violence toward staff/patients OR = 24.2; non-compliance with PRN (pro re nata) medications OR = 9.8; and damage to hospital property OR = 2.9. ROC analyses indicated that ELMB was significantly more accurate that BVC, with higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio. Results were similar across gender. The ELMB is a sensitive and specific instrument that can be used to guide the decision-making process when implementing seclusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; coercion; decision-making; prediction; seclusion; violence

Year:  2017        PMID: 29046647      PMCID: PMC5632740          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychiatry        ISSN: 1664-0640            Impact factor:   4.157


  54 in total

1.  A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.

Authors:  Georg Heinze; Michael Schemper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Nurses' attitudes to the use of seclusion: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Brenda Happell; Alison Harrow
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.503

3.  Reducing restraints: alternatives to restraints on an inpatient psychiatric service--utilizing safe and effective methods to evaluate and treat the violent patient.

Authors:  Ann M Sullivan; Janet Bezmen; Charles T Barron; James Rivera; Linda Curley-Casey; Dominic Marino
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2005

4.  A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data.

Authors:  Georg Heinze
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Restraint and seclusion: a distressing treatment option?

Authors:  A Moran; A Cocoman; P A Scott; A Matthews; V Staniuliene; M Valimaki
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.952

6.  An ethnomethodological analysis of the use of seclusion.

Authors:  T Mason
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Seclusion and restraint as measures of the quality of hospital care: any exceptions?

Authors:  Michael H Sacks; Michael F Walton
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Predicting risk of seclusion and restraint in a psychiatric intensive care (PIC) unit.

Authors:  S Roles; A Gouge; H Smith
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.952

9.  Patients' reports of traumatic or harmful experiences within the psychiatric setting.

Authors:  B Christopher Frueh; Rebecca G Knapp; Karen J Cusack; Anouk L Grubaugh; Julie A Sauvageot; Victoria C Cousins; Eunsil Yim; Cynthia S Robins; Jeannine Monnier; Thomas G Hiers
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Overcrowding in Psychiatric Wards is Associated With Increased Risk of Adverse Incidents.

Authors:  Alexander Teitelbaum; Amnon Lahad; Nitza Calfon; Monica Gun-Usishkin; Gad Lubin; Anat Tsur
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.