Hao Zhang1, Kristen Wroblewski2, Yulei Jiang3, Bill C Penney3, Daniel Appelbaum3, Cassie A Simon4, Ravi Salgia5, Yonglin Pu6. 1. Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States; Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. 3. Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. 4. Cancer Registry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. 5. Section of Hematology Oncology of Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. 6. Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. Electronic address: ypu@radiology.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTVWB) has been shown of prognostic value for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) beyond that of TNM stage, age, gender, performance status, and treatment selection. The current TNM staging system does not incorporate tumor volumetric information. We propose a new PET/CT volumetric prognostic (PVP) index that combines the prognostic value of MTVWB and TNM stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on 328 consecutive NSCLC patients with a baseline PET/CT scan before treatment, from which MTVWB was measured semi-automatically, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for ln(MTVWB) and TNM stage from a Cox proportional hazard regression model that consisted of only ln(MTVWB) and TNM stage as prognostic variables of overall survival. We used the regression coefficients, which gave rise to the HRs, as weights to formulate the PET/CT volumetric prognostic (PVP) index. We also compared the prognostic value of the PVP index against that of TNM stage alone and ln(MTVWB) alone with univariate and multivariate survival analyses and C-statistics. RESULTS: Univariate analysis C-statistic for the PVP index (C=0.71) was statistically significantly greater than those for TNM stage alone (C=0.67, p<0.01) and for ln(MTVWB) alone (C=0.69, p=0.033). Multivariate analyses showed that the PVP index yielded significantly greater discriminatory power (C=0.74) than similar models based on either TNM stage (C=0.72, p<0.01) or ln(MTVWB) (C=0.73, p<0.01). Lower values of the PVP index were associated with significantly better overall survival (adjusted HR=2.70, 95%CI [2.16, 3.37]). CONCLUSION: The PVP index provides a practical means for clinicians to combine the prognostic value of MTVWB and TNM stage and offers significantly better prognostic accuracy for overall survival of NSCLC patients than the current TNM staging system or metabolic tumor burden alone.
OBJECTIVES: Whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTVWB) has been shown of prognostic value for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) beyond that of TNM stage, age, gender, performance status, and treatment selection. The current TNM staging system does not incorporate tumor volumetric information. We propose a new PET/CT volumetric prognostic (PVP) index that combines the prognostic value of MTVWB and TNM stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on 328 consecutive NSCLCpatients with a baseline PET/CT scan before treatment, from which MTVWB was measured semi-automatically, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for ln(MTVWB) and TNM stage from a Cox proportional hazard regression model that consisted of only ln(MTVWB) and TNM stage as prognostic variables of overall survival. We used the regression coefficients, which gave rise to the HRs, as weights to formulate the PET/CT volumetric prognostic (PVP) index. We also compared the prognostic value of the PVP index against that of TNM stage alone and ln(MTVWB) alone with univariate and multivariate survival analyses and C-statistics. RESULTS: Univariate analysis C-statistic for the PVP index (C=0.71) was statistically significantly greater than those for TNM stage alone (C=0.67, p<0.01) and for ln(MTVWB) alone (C=0.69, p=0.033). Multivariate analyses showed that the PVP index yielded significantly greater discriminatory power (C=0.74) than similar models based on either TNM stage (C=0.72, p<0.01) or ln(MTVWB) (C=0.73, p<0.01). Lower values of the PVP index were associated with significantly better overall survival (adjusted HR=2.70, 95%CI [2.16, 3.37]). CONCLUSION: The PVP index provides a practical means for clinicians to combine the prognostic value of MTVWB and TNM stage and offers significantly better prognostic accuracy for overall survival of NSCLCpatients than the current TNM staging system or metabolic tumor burden alone.
Authors: Shengri Liao; Bill C Penney; Kristen Wroblewski; Hao Zhang; Cassie A Simon; Rony Kampalath; Ming-Chi Shih; Naoko Shimada; Sheng Chen; Ravi Salgia; Daniel E Appelbaum; Kenji Suzuki; Chin-Tu Chen; Yonglin Pu Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Percy Lee; Jose G Bazan; Philip W Lavori; Dilani K Weerasuriya; Andrew Quon; Quynh-Thu Le; Heather A Wakelee; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: N C Choi; R W Carey; W Daly; D Mathisen; J Wain; C Wright; T Lynch; M Grossbard; H Grillo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Everett E Vokes; James E Herndon; Michael J Kelley; M Giulia Cicchetti; Nithya Ramnath; Harvey Neill; James N Atkins; Dorothy M Watson; Wallace Akerley; Mark R Green Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-04-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K Furuse; M Fukuoka; M Kawahara; H Nishikawa; Y Takada; S Kudoh; N Katagami; Y Ariyoshi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yonglin Pu; James X Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Daniel Appelbaum; Jianfeng Meng; Bill C Penney Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Paula Lapa; Bárbara Oliveiros; Margarida Marques; Jorge Isidoro; Filipe Caseiro Alves; J M Nascimento Costa; Gracinda Costa; João Pedroso de Lima Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 9.236