Literature DB >> 10650107

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

J C Varghese1, R P Liddell, M A Farrell, F E Murray, D H Osborne, M J Lee.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and trans-abdominal ultrasound in the detection of choledocholithiasis, and to compare bile duct stone characteristics using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), MRCP and ultrasound.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 191 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic ERCP, choledocholithiasis was diagnosed in 34 patients using direct cholangiography. The latter took the form of ERCP (n = 29), intraoperative cholangiography (n = 3) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n = 2). All patients underwent MRCP and ultrasound examinations and their findings for choledocholitiasis were compared with those at direct cholangiography. Finally, in the 29 patients with choledocholithiasis diagnosed under ERCP, stone characteristics were compared across the three investigations of ERCP, MRCP and ultrasound.
RESULTS: Compared with direct cholangiography, MRCP showed a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 91%, 98% and 97%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. MRCP resulted in three false-negative and three false-positive findings, four of which occurred due to confusion with lesions at the ampulla. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 38%, 100% and 89%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. ERCP revealed a greater number of stones and these were more proximally distributed within the bile ducts when compared to MRCP.
CONCLUSIONS: MRCP is highly accurate in the diagnosis of choloedocholithiasis and has the potential to replace diagnostic ERCP. MRCP underestimates the number of bile duct stones present. Copyright 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10650107     DOI: 10.1053/crad.1999.0319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  32 in total

Review 1.  Intraductal ultrasound in the biliary tract.

Authors:  J Menzel; W Domschke
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-04

2.  Imaging diagnosis of pancreato-biliary diseases: a control study.

Authors:  Liang Zhong; Qiu-Ying Yao; Lei Li; Jian-Rong Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  S Schmidt; P Chevallier; S Novellas; E Gelsi; G Vanbiervliet; A Tran; P Schnyder; J N Bruneton
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Gallstone pancreatitis--who really needs an ERCP?

Authors:  M F Byrne
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice may miss choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Sanket Srinivasa; Tarik Sammour; Bernard McEntee; Nicola Davis; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  A D Barlow; J Haqq; D McCormack; M S Metcalfe; A R Dennison; G Garcea
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  Biochemical markers of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  W R Matull; S P Pereira; J W O'Donohue
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Prospective validation study of an algorithm for triage to MRCP or ERCP for investigation of suspected pancreatico-biliary disease.

Authors:  C N Parnaby; J T Jenkins; J C Ferguson; B W A Williamson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparative diagnostic evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography, ultrasonography and CT in patients with pancreatobiliary disease.

Authors:  S Maurea; O Caleo; C Mollica; M Imbriaco; P P Mainenti; C Palumbo; M Mancini; L Camera; M Salvatore
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.