Literature DB >> 18288530

Prospective validation study of an algorithm for triage to MRCP or ERCP for investigation of suspected pancreatico-biliary disease.

C N Parnaby1, J T Jenkins, J C Ferguson, B W A Williamson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected pancreatico-biliary disease, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be reserved for those requiring therapeutic intervention. However, difficulty arises in identifying patients likely to require therapy in the early phase of diagnostic work-up. An algorithm has been developed by the authors based upon prospective assessment of ERCP patients for triage of patients to magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or ERCP with suspected pancreatico-biliary disease. We aimed to validate this algorithm in an independent group of patients using a different group of endoscopists blinded to the algorithm.
METHODS: Patients were stratified into different categories by clinical, ultrasound and liver function test findings. The algorithm stratified patients by the likelihood of therapeutic intervention. The accuracy of the algorithm for a therapeutic outcome was assessed by receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: Hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients (Oct 2005 to July 2006) were prospectively assessed by MRCP or ERCP according to the algorithm, and the outcomes recorded. Fifty-seven patients were triaged to MRCP and 63 patients were triaged to ERCP. A category was not assessable in five patients. Three patients from the MRCP group required subsequent therapeutic ERCP. Diagnostic ERCP was performed in three patients in the ERCP group. ERCP-related complications occurred in four patients. The algorithm performed well in predicting the requirement for intervention as determined by the area under the ROC curve [0.84 (95%CI 0.76-0.92)].
CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that an algorithm-based approach can reproducibly predict those patients requiring therapeutic biliary intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18288530     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9775-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Mathematical model for predicting biliary therapeutic endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  W Luman; E S Y Chan
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.088

2.  Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study.

Authors:  V de Lédinghen; R Lecesne; J M Raymond; V Gense; M Amouretti; J Drouillard; P Couzigou; C Silvain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy without cholecystectomy for gall stone pancreatitis.

Authors:  C R Welbourn; D E Beckly; I A Eyre-Brook
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  K P Koo; L W Traverso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  A prospective audit against national standards of the presentation and management of acute pancreatitis in the South of England.

Authors:  S K Toh; S Phillips; C D Johnson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Prospective study to develop an algorithm for investigation by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  John T Jenkins; Barry W A Williamson
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 7.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; E Lezoche; M Morino; E Croce; A Lacy; J Toouli; A Faggioni; V M Ribeiro; J Jakimowicz; J Visa; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.

Authors:  F Prat; B Meduri; B Ducot; R Chiche; R Salimbeni-Bartolini; G Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis.

Authors:  F Prat; G Amouyal; P Amouyal; G Pelletier; J Fritsch; A D Choury; C Buffet; J P Etienne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-01-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inpatient magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: does it increase the efficiency in emergency hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery services?

Authors:  J A Milburn; J A Bailey; Wk Dunn; I C Cameron; D S Gomez
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.

Authors:  Francesco A Polistina; Mauro Frego; Marco Bisello; Emy Manzi; Antonella Vardanega; Bortolo Perin
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.