Literature DB >> 21092433

Selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice may miss choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis.

Sanket Srinivasa1, Tarik Sammour, Bernard McEntee, Nicola Davis, Andrew G Hill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gallstone pancreatitis is a consequence of ampullary obstruction by common bile duct (CBD) calculi. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has been advocated for routine use to diagnose choledocholithiasis. However, the selective use of MRCP in clinically equivocal situations has not been explored until now. This study examines the diagnostic value of selective MRCP in gallstone pancreatitis.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective audit of all presentations of gallstone pancreatitis between January 2001 and December 2007 at Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. Demographic data, clinical presentation, biochemical and radiological findings and outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: There were 339 cases of gallstone pancreatitis during the study period; 236 patients were women and the mean age was 52 years. Overall, choledocholithiasis was diagnosed in 95 patients. A total of 117 patients underwent MRCP within a median of 4 days of admission, with 15 (13.7%) showing choledocholithiasis. There was no significant difference in time to MRCP between positive and negative groups. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) confirmed 13 of 15 stones within a median of 2.5 days. However, MRCP missed 8 cases of choledocholithiasis subsequently demonstrated on ERCP/IOC, where clinical suspicion remained after a negative MRCP. Its sensitivity was 62% and specificity 98%. The positive likelihood ratio was 6.5 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.1. In all, 222 patients followed different clinical pathways with 82 CBD stones diagnosed by ERCP/IOC.
CONCLUSION: Selective MRCP is highly specific in gallstone pancreatitis but may not be sensitive enough to exclude choledocholithiasis in this context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21092433      PMCID: PMC2993039     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  31 in total

1.  Choledocholithiasis: a prospective study of spontaneous common bile duct stone migration.

Authors:  J L Frossard; A Hadengue; G Amouyal; A Choury; O Marty; E Giostra; F Sivignon; L Sosa; P Amouyal
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  J C Varghese; R P Liddell; M A Farrell; F E Murray; D H Osborne; M J Lee
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.

Authors:  M R Arguedas; A W Dupont; C M Wilcox
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  L Chang; S Lo; B E Stabile; R J Lewis; K Toosie; C de Virgilio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Gallstone migration as a cause of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J M Acosta; C L Ledesma
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Migration of gall stones.

Authors:  T V Taylor; C P Armstrong
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-23

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the common bile duct to exclude choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ritwik Kejriwal; Jennifer Liang; Graeme Anderson; Andrew Hill
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  Preoperative determinants of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A J Sheen; S Asthana; A Al-Mukhtar; M Attia; G J Toogood
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Preoperative routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  M B Jendresen; J E Thorbøll; S Adamsen; H Nielsen; S Grønvall; O Hart-Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

10.  Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  S L Blamey; C W Imrie; J O'Neill; W H Gilmour; D C Carter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  10 in total

1.  Non-invasive assessment of choledocholithiasis in patients with gallstones and abnormal liver function.

Authors:  Bilal O Al-Jiffry; Abdeen Elfateh; Tariq Chundrigar; Bassem Othman; Owaid Almalki; Fares Rayza; Hashem Niyaz; Hesham Elmakhzangy; Mohammed Hatem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  A D Barlow; J Haqq; D McCormack; M S Metcalfe; A R Dennison; G Garcea
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Inpatient magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: does it increase the efficiency in emergency hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery services?

Authors:  J A Milburn; J A Bailey; Wk Dunn; I C Cameron; D S Gomez
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a combined (one-step) procedure: a random comparison to the standard (two-step) procedure.

Authors:  Maris Jones; Matthew Johnson; Edward Samourjian; Karen Schlauch; Karen Slauch; Nathan Ozobia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Intraoperative ERCP: What role does it have in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Luis R Rábago; Alejandro Ortega; Inmaculada Chico; David Collado; Ana Olivares; Jose Luis Castro; Elvira Quintanilla
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16

7.  Single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP: management of patients with possible choledocholithiasis and gallbladder in situ in a non-tertiary Spanish hospital.

Authors:  L R Rábago; I Chico; D Collado; A Olivares; A Ortega; E Quintanilla; M Delgado; J L Castro; R Llorente; J Vazquez Echarri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

9.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for secondary common bile duct stones compared with laparoscopic trans-cystic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Peixin Li; Zhongtao Zhang; Jianshe Li; Lan Jin; Wei Han; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-06-04

10.  Safe laparoscopic clearance of the common bile duct in emergently admitted patients with choledocholithiasis and cholangitis.

Authors:  Kristaps Atstupens; Haralds Plaudis; Vladimirs Fokins; Maksims Mukans; Guntars Pupelis
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2016-05-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.