Literature DB >> 11276382

Intraductal ultrasound in the biliary tract.

J Menzel1, W Domschke.   

Abstract

Although endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) represents a major advance in endoscopic imaging, endosonography using dedicated echoendoscopes has some serious drawbacks, including the diameter of the echoendoscope (12 to 13 mm), the lack of intraluminal examination of the pancreatobiliary duct system due to the size of the instrument, unsatisfactory image quality and resolution for small lesions, and the need for a second examination separate from the previous routine endoscopy. Recently developed ultrasonographic miniprobes (diameter, about 2 mm; frequency, 12 to 20 MHz) can be passed through the working channel of standard endoscopes to provide high-frequency ultrasound images. These miniprobes may overcome some of the noted drawbacks and add to the safety and convenience of patients. Moreover, in various diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreatobiliary ductal system, the diagnostic accuracy of miniprobe ultrasonography has been proven to be superior to that of EUS. Miniprobe ultrasonography is a promising tool that adds new capabilities to the armamentarium of gastroenterologic diagnostic assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11276382     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-001-0011-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  43 in total

1.  The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  D R Lindsell
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  R E Hintze; A Adler; W Veltzke; H Abou-Rebyeh; R Hammerstingl; T Vogl; R Felix
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Influence of biliary drainage catheter on bile duct wall thickness as measured by intraductal ultrasonography.

Authors:  K Tamada; T Tomiyama; M Ichiyama; A Oohashi; S Wada; T Nishizono; S Tano; T Aizawa; K Ido; K Kimura
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Assessment of pancreatic parenchymal invasion by bile duct cancer using intraductal ultrasonography.

Authors:  K Tamada; N Ueno; M Ichiyama; T Tomiyama; T Nishizono; S Wada; A Oohashi; S Tano; T Aizawa; K Ido; K Kimura
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 5.  [Intraductal ultrasound of the bile ducts].

Authors:  H J Brambs
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Endoscopic ultrasound miniprobe-guided steroid injection for treatment of refractory esophageal strictures.

Authors:  M S Bhutani; N Usman; V Shenoy; A Qarqash; A Singh; C J Barde; N Gopalswamy
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer by a 15 MHz ultrasound miniprobe.

Authors:  S Hamada; K Akahoshi; Y Chijiiwa; I Sasaki; H Nawata
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Adenoma of the papilla of Vater: a possible role for intraductal ultrasound (IDUS).

Authors:  J Menzel; E C Foerster; W Domschke
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Preoperative staging of extrahepatic bile duct cancer with intraductal ultrasonography.

Authors:  K Tamada; K Ido; N Ueno; K Kimura; M Ichiyama; T Tomiyama
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Assessment of hepatic artery invasion by bile duct cancer using intraductal ultrasonography.

Authors:  K Tamada; K Ido; N Ueno; M Ichiyama; T Tomiyama; T Nishizono; S Wada; T Noda; S Tano; T Aizawa
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.093

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.