A E Pinto1, S André, J Soares. 1. Departamento de Patologia Morfológica, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal.
Abstract
AIM: To determine the importance of tumour DNA ploidy and cell proliferation, as measured by the S phase fraction (SPF), in relation to other established clinicopathological indicators of prognosis in breast cancer. METHODS: A prospective study of 308 patients. Tumours were staged following the TNM system criteria and were classified according to the histological type and grade. DNA flow cytometry was performed on fresh/frozen samples stained with propidium iodide. Hormone receptors were analyzed by immunocytochemistry. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for statistical evaluation of the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Median follow up time was 39.6 months (range 3 to 84). A DNA diploid pattern was found in 134 tumours (43.5%) and aneuploid in 174 (56.5%). Median SPF value was 6.1% (range 1% to 27.8%). DNA ploidy and SPF were strongly correlated (p < 0.001), and both were related to histological type (p < 0.001), grade of differentiation (p < 0.001), tumour size (p = 0.006 and p = 0.002), and hormone receptor activity (p < 0.001). DNA ploidy was also related to node status (p = 0.022), but SPF was not. In univariate analysis, there were significant correlations between disease-free survival and age, histological grade, tumour size, node status, DNA ploidy, SPF, and hormone receptor activity; age, tumour size, node status, DNA ploidy, and hormone receptors were predictors of overall survival. In multivariate analysis, only node status (p = 0.001) and DNA ploidy (p = 0.006) retained independent prognostic significance in relation with overall survival, while node status (p < 0.001) and SPF (p < 0.001) were predictors of disease-free survival. DNA ploidy and SPF continued to predict disease-free and overall survival in lymph node positive (pN1) patients but not in the lymph node negative (pN0) group. CONCLUSIONS: DNA ploidy and SPF are strongly intercorrelated and have independent prognostic value for predicting the short term clinical outcome of breast carcinoma patients.
AIM: To determine the importance of tumour DNA ploidy and cell proliferation, as measured by the S phase fraction (SPF), in relation to other established clinicopathological indicators of prognosis in breast cancer. METHODS: A prospective study of 308 patients. Tumours were staged following the TNM system criteria and were classified according to the histological type and grade. DNA flow cytometry was performed on fresh/frozen samples stained with propidium iodide. Hormone receptors were analyzed by immunocytochemistry. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for statistical evaluation of the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Median follow up time was 39.6 months (range 3 to 84). A DNA diploid pattern was found in 134 tumours (43.5%) and aneuploid in 174 (56.5%). Median SPF value was 6.1% (range 1% to 27.8%). DNA ploidy and SPF were strongly correlated (p < 0.001), and both were related to histological type (p < 0.001), grade of differentiation (p < 0.001), tumour size (p = 0.006 and p = 0.002), and hormone receptor activity (p < 0.001). DNA ploidy was also related to node status (p = 0.022), but SPF was not. In univariate analysis, there were significant correlations between disease-free survival and age, histological grade, tumour size, node status, DNA ploidy, SPF, and hormone receptor activity; age, tumour size, node status, DNA ploidy, and hormone receptors were predictors of overall survival. In multivariate analysis, only node status (p = 0.001) and DNA ploidy (p = 0.006) retained independent prognostic significance in relation with overall survival, while node status (p < 0.001) and SPF (p < 0.001) were predictors of disease-free survival. DNA ploidy and SPF continued to predict disease-free and overall survival in lymph node positive (pN1) patients but not in the lymph node negative (pN0) group. CONCLUSIONS: DNA ploidy and SPF are strongly intercorrelated and have independent prognostic value for predicting the short term clinical outcome of breast carcinomapatients.
Authors: B Baldetorp; P O Bendahl; M Fernö; K Alanen; U Delle; U Falkmer; B Hansson-Aggesjö; T Höckenström; A Lindgren; L Mossberg Journal: Cytometry Date: 1995-06-15
Authors: A J Nixon; D Neuberg; D F Hayes; R Gelman; J L Connolly; S Schnitt; A Abner; A Recht; F Vicini; J R Harris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T E Witzig; J N Ingle; S S Cha; D J Schaid; R L Tabery; L E Wold; C Grant; N J Gonchoroff; J A Katzmann Journal: Cancer Date: 1994-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: O Stål; M Dufmats; T Hatschek; J Carstensen; C Klintenberg; L E Rutqvist; L Skoog; S Sullivan; S Wingren; B Nordenskjöld Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R S Camplejohn; C M Ash; C E Gillett; B Raikundalia; D M Barnes; W M Gregory; M A Richards; R R Millis Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 7.640