Literature DB >> 36039057

S-phase fraction, lymph node status and disease staging as the main prognostic factors to differentiate between young and older patients with invasive breast carcinoma.

António E Pinto1, João Matos1, Teresa Pereira1, Giovani L Silva2,3, Saudade André1.   

Abstract

The influence of age on the outcome of patients with invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) has not yet been fully established. The present study investigated two subgroups of patients either side of the age spectrum, and evaluated cytometric, histopathological and molecular characteristics. The series involved 219 patients with IBC that had long-term follow-up, which were divided into two subgroups: Young (≤45 years; n=103) and old patients (≥75 years; n=116). Immunohistochemical evaluation of hormonal receptors, Ki67 index and HER2 status (plus HER2 silver in situ hybridization in equivocal cases) were used as the basis for surrogate molecular subtyping. Ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) were analysed by DNA flow cytometry. Differences between the subgroups' characteristics were assessed by the two proportion Z test. Kaplan-Meier estimation and log-rank test were applied for survival analyses. The median age in the subgroups were 40 years (range, 19-45 years) in the young group and 78 years (range, 75-91 years) in the older subgroup. Young patients exhibited higher lymph node involvement, more advanced disease staging, higher SPF tumour proliferative activity, and a trend of lower incidence of Luminal A and higher incidence of Luminal B tumours. The median SPF value was significantly higher in young patients [7.1% (range, 1.5-23.7%) vs. 4.5% (range, 0.7-26.4%)], whereas the ploidy pattern showed no significant difference. In the whole series, as within IBC of no special type, young patients had a higher rate of recurrence (46.6 vs. 22.4%; P<0.001) and deaths from disease (35.9 vs. 20.7%; P=0.030), with a statistically significant difference for disease-free survival. In conclusion, the present study indicated that young patients with IBC exhibited more aggressive disease, with an increased risk of recurrence and shorter disease-free survival. SPF, lymph node status and staging appeared to be the main prognostic factors to differentiate young from older patients with IBC.
Copyright © 2022, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  histopathological features; invasive breast carcinoma; prognosis; proliferative markers; young and older patients

Year:  2022        PMID: 36039057      PMCID: PMC9404687          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   3.111


  38 in total

1.  Short-term significance of DNA ploidy and cell proliferation in breast carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic markers in a series of 308 patients.

Authors:  A E Pinto; S André; J Soares
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The prognostic impact of age in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Achim Rody; Oleg Gluz; Kristin Baumann; Daniel Beyer; Eva-Beatrice Kohls; Kerstin Lausen; Lars Hanker; Uwe Holtrich; Sven Becker; Thomas Karn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Prognostic relevance of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer revisited: The 25-year experience of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon.

Authors:  António E Pinto; Teresa Pereira; Giovani L Silva; Saudade André
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  DNA ploidy is an independent predictor of survival in breast invasive ductal carcinoma: a long-term multivariate analysis of 393 patients.

Authors:  António E Pinto; Teresa Pereira; Márcia Santos; Mariana Branco; Angelo Dias; Giovani L Silva; Mónica C Ferreira; Saudade André
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Model for the genetic evolution of human solid tumors.

Authors:  S E Shackney; C A Smith; B W Miller; D R Burholt; K Murtha; H R Giles; D M Ketterer; A A Pollice
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression.

Authors:  Carey K Anders; David S Hsu; Gloria Broadwater; Chaitanya R Acharya; John A Foekens; Yi Zhang; Yixin Wang; P Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; Phillip G Febbo; Joseph R Nevins; Anil Potti; Kimberly L Blackwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Breast cancer in young women.

Authors:  Courtney A Gabriel; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation.

Authors:  Soomin Ahn; Ji Won Woo; Kyoungyul Lee; So Yeon Park
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2019-11-06

10.  Molecular features in young vs elderly breast cancer patients and the impacts on survival disparities by age at diagnosis.

Authors:  Mei-Xia Wang; Jun-Ting Ren; Lu-Ying Tang; Ze-Fang Ren
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.