Literature DB >> 7819030

The prognostic significance of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer: results from 881 patients treated in a single centre.

R S Camplejohn1, C M Ash, C E Gillett, B Raikundalia, D M Barnes, W M Gregory, M A Richards, R R Millis.   

Abstract

In this single-centre study of 881 patients, S-phase fraction (SPF) was shown to be a significant prognostic marker in terms of overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and survival after relapse (SAR). Further, SPF had independent prognostic significance when considering a range of other clinicopathological variables, namely tumour grade and stage, nodal status, patient age, tumour size, menstrual status and treatment details. For OS and RFS, SPF was the second strongest predictor of the clinical course of the disease after nodal status, and for SAR it was the strongest prognostic marker. SPF correlated positively with histological grade but was the stronger predictor of survival. The distribution of SPF values was markedly different for the two ploidy classes of tumour, with DNA aneuploid tumours having a significantly higher average SPF. However, SPF retained its independent prognostic ability when DNA diploid and aneuploid tumours were analysed separately, DNA ploidy itself also proved to be an independent prognostic marker but the survival difference between the two ploidy classes was much less than that seen for different levels of SPF. Tumours with several DNA aneuploid populations (multiploid tumours) tended to have a worse prognosis than other aneuploid tumours but this trend did not reach statistical significance. In this and other studies from this centre, SPF has proved to be a robust predictor of clinical outcome in carcinoma of the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7819030      PMCID: PMC2033468          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  25 in total

1.  Analysis of PCP-data to determine the fraction of cells in the various phases of cell cycle.

Authors:  H Baisch; W Göhde; W A Linden
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1975-06-13       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Node negative breast cancer.

Authors:  S M O'Reilly; M A Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-10

Review 3.  Ploidy, proliferative activity and prognosis. DNA flow cytometry of solid tumors.

Authors:  D E Merkel; W L McGuire
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with melphalan for breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Rubens; J L Hayward; R K Knight; R D Bulbrook; I S Fentiman; M Chaudary; A Howell; H Bush; D Crowther; R A Sellwood; W D George; J M Howat
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Measurement of S-phase fractions in lymphoid tissue comparing fresh versus paraffin-embedded tissue and 4',6'-diamidino-2 phenylindole dihydrochloride versus propidium iodide staining.

Authors:  R S Camplejohn; J C Macartney; R W Morris
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1989-07

6.  Ki67 immunostaining in primary breast cancer: pathological and clinical associations.

Authors:  N Bouzubar; K J Walker; K Griffiths; I O Ellis; C W Elston; J F Robertson; R W Blamey; R I Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  The relationship between histological grade, oestrogen receptor status, events and survival at 8 years in the NATO ('Nolvadex') trial.

Authors:  L Singh; A J Wilson; M Baum; W F Whimster; I H Birch; I M Jackson; C Lowrey; M K Palmer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content in invasive breast cancer--a study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  S Toikkanen; H Joensuu; P Klemi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Histological grade, elastosis, DNA ploidy and the response to chemotherapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  J R Masters; R S Camplejohn; R R Millis; R D Rubens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Short-term significance of DNA ploidy and cell proliferation in breast carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic markers in a series of 308 patients.

Authors:  A E Pinto; S André; J Soares
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  DNA ploidy analyses in 218 consecutive Pakistani breast cancer patients: does it add anything?

Authors:  E Khan; Z Mapara; S Khan; N Arshad; T Siddiqui; S Pervez
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Relation between deletion of chromosome 1p36 and DNA ploidy in breast carcinoma: an interphase cytogenetic study.

Authors:  F Farabegoli; N Baldini; D Santini; C Ceccarelli; M Taffurelli; D Treré; M Derenzini
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1996-04

4.  Prognostic relevance of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer revisited: The 25-year experience of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon.

Authors:  António E Pinto; Teresa Pereira; Giovani L Silva; Saudade André
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Comparison of the Ki-67 score and S-phase fraction as prognostic variables in soft-tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  R L Huuhtanen; C P Blomqvist; T A Wiklund; T O Böhling; M J Virolainen; E J Tukiainen; B Tribukait; L C Andersson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  An inbred colony of oncogene transgenic mice: diversity of tumours and potential as a therapeutic model.

Authors:  H Thomas; A M Hanby; R A Smith; P Hagger; K Patel; B Raikundalia; R S Camplejohn; F R Balkwill
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Comparison of MIB-1 proliferation index with S-phase fraction in human breast carcinomas.

Authors:  P A Ellis; A Makris; S A Burton; J Titley; M G Ormerod; J Salter; T J Powles; I E Smith; M Dowsett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.