Literature DB >> 8331681

Evaluating the potential usefulness of new prognostic and predictive indicators in node-negative breast cancer patients.

G Gasparini1, F Pozza, A L Harris.   

Abstract

The incidence of breast cancer is increasing in all Western countries. Due both to a more widespread public education and to early diagnosis by mammography screening programs, the percentage of patients with node-negative breast cancer has gone up to 70%. Thus, node-negative breast cancer is a major public health problem and, consequently, clinical research in this setting is an expanding field. A recent overview analysis confirmed the results of five prospective randomized clinical trials suggesting that systemic adjuvant therapy can benefit node-negative breast cancer patients. Because of the heterogeneity of node-negative breast cancer, it is reasonable to attempt to avoid excessive treatment morbidity and costs by using selective prognostic markers to identify patients at high risk for disease recurrence who are eligible for postsurgical systemic adjuvant therapy. It is also desirable to use predictive markers in selecting the therapy to which each patient is more likely to respond. The need for additional prognostic and predictive factors has led to identification of a plethora of potentially useful markers. As a result, the selection of patients at different risks of developing node-negative breast cancer and the choice for appropriate therapy remain difficult and confusing for the clinician. Moreover, the majority of studies have examined new markers individually rather than by multivariate analysis and retrospectively rather than prospectively. Thus, there are also important methodologic biases in such studies. This analysis consists of (a) defining the clinical "problem," (b) defining the terms of prognostic and predictive factors, (c) suggesting more appropriate laboratory and clinical approaches to properly evaluate a new indicator, (d) identifying the subsets of patients in whom the use of new prognosticators is warranted and of particular importance, and (e) providing some direction for future research on this topic. Our ultimate goals are to facilitate the understanding of node-negative breast cancer prognostic markers among clinicians, to help them select the most appropriate indicator for specific situations, and to recommend methodology for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8331681     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.15.1206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  37 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer: current and new predictors of metastasis.

Authors:  D F Hayes; C Isaacs; V Stearns
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Correlation of the HER-2 protein expression and other clinicopathological features of ductal infiltrative breast cancer.

Authors:  Svjetlana Radović; Mirsad Babić; Mirsad Dorić; Edina Balta; Erol Kapetanović; Senad Secić
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  [Prognostic and predictive factors of invasive breast cancer: update 2009].

Authors:  T Decker; D Hungermann; W Böcker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Biomarkers for breast cancer.

Authors:  C C Benz
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-02

5.  CYP2D6 genotype is not associated with survival in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  D L Hertz; K M Kidwell; S G Hilsenbeck; S Oesterreich; C K Osborne; S Philips; C Chenault; R J Hartmaier; T C Skaar; M J Sikora; J M Rae
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Short-term significance of DNA ploidy and cell proliferation in breast carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic markers in a series of 308 patients.

Authors:  A E Pinto; S André; J Soares
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Flow cytometric DNA hypertetraploidy is associated with unfavourable prognostic features in breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Pinto; S André; M Nogueira; E Mendonça; J Soares
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Selection of more aggressive variants of the gI101A human breast cancer cell line: a model for analyzing the metastatic phenotype of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dina Chelouche Lev; Galina Kiriakova; Janet E Price
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  Prediction of outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer: evaluation with prognostic factors and Nottingham prognostic index.

Authors:  Mu-Tai Liu; Wen-Tao Huang; Ai-Yih Wang; Chia-Chun Huang; Chao-Yuan Huang; Tung-Hao Chang; Chu-Pin Pi; Hao-Han Yang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Breast cancer angiogenesis--new approaches to therapy via antiangiogenesis, hypoxic activated drugs, and vascular targeting.

Authors:  A L Harris; H Zhang; A Moghaddam; S Fox; P Scott; A Pattison; K Gatter; I Stratford; R Bicknell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.