Literature DB >> 11991356

Improving the quality of protein structures derived by NMR spectroscopy.

Christian A E M Spronk1, Jens P Linge, Cornelis W Hilbers, Geerten W Vuister.   

Abstract

Biomolecular structures provide the basis for many studies in several research areas such as homology modelling, structure-based drug design and functional genomics. It is an important prerequisite that the structure is reliable in terms of accurate description of the experimental data, and in terms of good quality of local- and overall geometry. Recent surveys indicate that structures solved by NMR-spectroscopy normally are of lower precision than high-resolution X-ray structures. Here, we present a refinement protocol that improves the quality of protein structures determined by NMR-spectroscopy to the level of those determined by high resolution X-ray crystallography in terms of local geometry. The protocol was tested on experimental data of the proteins IL4 and Ubiquitin and on simulated data of the protein Crambin. In almost all aspects, the protocol yielded better results in terms of accuracy and precision. Independent validation of the results for Ubiquitin, using residual dipolar couplings, indicates that the ensemble of NMR structure is substantially improved by the protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11991356     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014971029663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  16 in total

1.  Accurate protein crystallography at ultra-high resolution: valence electron distribution in crambin.

Authors:  C Jelsch; M M Teeter; V Lamzin; V Pichon-Pesme; R H Blessing; C Lecomte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR.

Authors:  J F Doreleijers; M L Raves; T Rullmann; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Sources of and solutions to problems in the refinement of protein NMR structures against torsion angle potentials of mean force.

Authors:  J Kuszewski; G M Clore
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program.

Authors:  G Vriend
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1990-03

5.  Validation of nuclear magnetic resonance structures of proteins and nucleic acids: hydrogen geometry and nomenclature.

Authors:  J F Doreleijers; G Vriend; M L Raves; R Kaptein
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-11-15

6.  Quality assessment of NMR structures: a statistical survey.

Authors:  J F Doreleijers; J A Rullmann; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-08-07       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Measurement of dipolar contributions to 1JCH splittings from magnetic-field dependence of J modulation in two-dimensional NMR spectra.

Authors:  N Tjandra; A Bax
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR.

Authors:  R A Laskowski; J A Rullmannn; M W MacArthur; R Kaptein; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Objectively judging the quality of a protein structure from a Ramachandran plot.

Authors:  R W Hooft; C Sander; G Vriend
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1997-08

10.  Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 A resolution.

Authors:  S Vijay-Kumar; C E Bugg; W J Cook
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  29 in total

1.  The precision of NMR structure ensembles revisited.

Authors:  Chris A E M Spronk; Sander B Nabuurs; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Elmar Krieger; Geerten W Vuister; Gert Vriend
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  A use of Ramachandran potentials in protein solution structure determinations.

Authors:  Ivano Bertini; Gabriele Cavallaro; Claudio Luchinat; Irene Poli
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  T4 AsiA blocks DNA recognition by remodeling sigma70 region 4.

Authors:  Lester J Lambert; Yufeng Wei; Virgil Schirf; Borries Demeler; Milton H Werner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Resolution-by-proxy: a simple measure for assessing and comparing the overall quality of NMR protein structures.

Authors:  Mark Berjanskii; Jianjun Zhou; Yongjie Liang; Guohui Lin; David S Wishart
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Elucidating the Specificity Determinants of the AtxE2 Lasso Peptide Isopeptidase.

Authors:  Mikhail O Maksimov; Joseph D Koos; Chuhan Zong; Bozhena Lisko; A James Link
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  An AMBER/DYANA/MOLMOL phosphorylated amino acid library set and incorporation into NMR structure calculations.

Authors:  John W Craft; Glen B Legge
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Definition of a new information-based per-residue quality parameter.

Authors:  Sander B Nabuurs; Elmar Krieger; Chris A E M Spronk; Aart J Nederveen; Gert Vriend; Geerten W Vuister
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Estimating the accuracy of protein structures using residual dipolar couplings.

Authors:  Katya Simon; Jun Xu; Chinpal Kim; Nikolai R Skrynnikov
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Chemically accurate protein structures: validation of protein NMR structures by comparison of measured and predicted pKa values.

Authors:  N Powers; Jan H Jensen
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  The war of tools: how can NMR spectroscopists detect errors in their structures?

Authors:  Edoardo Saccenti; Antonio Rosato
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.