Literature DB >> 9229503

Floating stereospecific assignment revisited: application to an 18 kDa protein and comparison with J-coupling data.

R H Folmer1, C W Hilbers, R N Konings, M Nilges.   

Abstract

We report a floating chirality procedure to treat nonstereospecifically assigned methylene or isopropyl groups in the calculation of protein structures from NMR data using restrained molecular dynamics and simulated annealing. The protocol makes use of two strategies to induce the proper conformation of the prochiral centres: explicit atom 'swapping' following an evaluation of the NOE energy term, and atom 'floating' by reducing the angle and improper force constants that enforce a defined chirality at the prochiral centre. The individual contributions of both approaches have been investigated. In addition, the effects of accuracy and precision of the interproton distance restraints were studied. The model system employed is the 18 kDa single-stranded DNA binding protein encoded by Pseudomonas bacteriophage Pf3. Floating chirality was applied to all methylene and isopropyl groups that give rise to non-degenerate NMR signals, and the results for 34 of these groups were compared to J-coupling data. We conclude that floating stereospecific assignment is a reliable tool in protein structure calculation. Its use is beneficial because it allows the distance restraints to be extracted directly from the measured peak volumes without the need for averaging or adding pseudoatom corrections. As a result, the calculated structures are of a quality almost comparable to that obtained with stereospecific assignments. As floating chirality furthermore is the only approach treating prochiral centres that ensures a consistent assignment of the two proton frequencies in a single structure, it seems to be preferable over using pseudoatoms or (R(-6)) averaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9229503     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018670623695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  20 in total

Review 1.  An evaluation of computational strategies for use in the determination of protein structure from distance constraints obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  T F Havel
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Efficient computation of three-dimensional protein structures in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data using the program DIANA and the supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA.

Authors:  P Güntert; W Braun; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-02-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Stereospecific assignments of side-chain protons and characterization of torsion angles in Eglin c.

Authors:  S G Hyberts; W Märki; G Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1987-05-04

4.  A (13)C double-filtered NOESY with strongly reduced artefacts and improved sensitivity.

Authors:  R H Folmer; C W Hilbers; R N Konings; K Hallenga
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Solution conformations of human growth hormone releasing factor: comparison of the restrained molecular dynamics and distance geometry methods for a system without long-range distance data.

Authors:  A T Brünger; G M Clore; A M Gronenborn; M Karplus
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1987 Oct-Nov

6.  A calculation strategy for the structure determination of symmetric dimers by 1H NMR.

Authors:  M Nilges
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-11

7.  An assessment of the precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by NMR. Dependence on distance errors.

Authors:  D Zhao; O Jardetzky
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-06-24       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Pseudo-structures for the 20 common amino acids for use in studies of protein conformations by measurements of intramolecular proton-proton distance constraints with nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  K Wüthrich; M Billeter; W Braun
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Statistical strategy for stereospecific hydrogen NMR assignments: validation procedures for the floating prochirality method.

Authors:  R A Beckman; S Litwin; A J Wand
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Solution structure of the single-stranded DNA binding protein of the filamentous Pseudomonas phage Pf3: similarity to other proteins binding to single-stranded nucleic acids.

Authors:  R H Folmer; M Nilges; R N Konings; C W Hilbers
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  32 in total

1.  The structure and dynamics in solution of Cu(I) pseudoazurin from Paracoccus pantotrophus.

Authors:  G S Thompson; Y C Leung; S J Ferguson; S E Radford; C Redfield
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Rotamer strain as a determinant of protein structural specificity.

Authors:  G A Lazar; E C Johnson; J R Desjarlais; T M Handel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR.

Authors:  J F Doreleijers; M L Raves; T Rullmann; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Variability in automated assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional structure determination: a test case on three small disulfide-bonded proteins.

Authors:  P Savarin; S Zinn-Justin; B Gilquin
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  NMR structure of the calreticulin P-domain.

Authors:  L Ellgaard; R Riek; T Herrmann; P Güntert; D Braun; A Helenius; K Wüthrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Characterization and solution structure of mouse myristoylated methionine sulfoxide reductase A.

Authors:  Jung Chae Lim; James M Gruschus; Bart Ghesquière; Geumsoo Kim; Grzegorz Piszczek; Nico Tjandra; Rodney L Levine
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Structural and kinetic characterization of the simplified SH3 domain FP1.

Authors:  Qian Yi; Ponni Rajagopal; Rachel E Klevit; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Solution conformation of alpha-conotoxin GIC, a novel potent antagonist of alpha3beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Seung-Wook Chi; Do-Hyoung Kim; Baldomero M Olivera; J Michael McIntosh; Kyou-Hoon Han
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Nuclear overhauser spectroscopy of chiral CHD methylene groups.

Authors:  Rafal Augustyniak; Jan Stanek; Henri Colaux; Geoffrey Bodenhausen; Wiktor Koźmiński; Torsten Herrmann; Fabien Ferrage
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Structural characterization of Lyn-SH3 domain in complex with a herpesviral protein reveals an extended recognition motif that enhances binding affinity.

Authors:  Finn Bauer; Kristian Schweimer; Heike Meiselbach; Silke Hoffmann; Paul Rösch; Heinrich Sticht
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.