Literature DB >> 11430756

Principal components analysis of protein structure ensembles calculated using NMR data.

P W Howe1.   

Abstract

One important problem when calculating structures of biomolecules from NMR data is distinguishing converged structures from outlier structures. This paper describes how Principal Components Analysis (PCA) has the potential to classify calculated structures automatically, according to correlated structural variation across the population. PCA analysis has the additional advantage that it highlights regions of proteins which are varying across the population. To apply PCA, protein structures have to be reduced in complexity and this paper describes two different representations of protein structures which achieve this. The calculated structures of a 28 amino acid peptide are used to demonstrate the methods. The two different representations of protein structure are shown to give equivalent results, and correct results are obtained even though the ensemble of structures used as an example contains two different protein conformations. The PCA analysis also correctly identifies the structural differences between the two conformations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11430756     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011210009067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  12 in total

1.  Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR.

Authors:  J F Doreleijers; M L Raves; T Rullmann; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Functional concerted motions in the bovine serum retinol-binding protein.

Authors:  P L Chau; D M van Aalten; R P Bywater; J B Findlay
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  DNA recognition by the oestrogen receptor: from solution to the crystal.

Authors:  J W Schwabe; L Chapman; J T Finch; D Rhodes; D Neuhaus
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Extensive distance geometry calculations with different NOE calibrations: new criteria for structure selection applied to Sandostatin and BPTI.

Authors:  H Widmer; A Widmer; W Braun
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Essential spaces defined by NMR structure ensembles and molecular dynamics simulation show significant overlap.

Authors:  R Abseher; L Horstink; C W Hilbers; M Nilges
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-06-01

6.  Outlier detection in multivariate analytical chemical data.

Authors:  W J Egan; S L Morgan
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Dynamic properties of the guanine nucleotide binding protein alpha subunit and comparison of its guanosine triphosphate hydrolase domain with that of ras p21.

Authors:  L V Mello; D M van Aalten; J B Findlay
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Essential dynamics from NMR clusters: dynamic properties of the Myb DNA-binding domain and a hinge-bending enhancing variant.

Authors:  D M van Aalten; E Grotewold; L Joshua-Tor
Journal:  Methods       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Assessing the quality of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures by complete cross-validation.

Authors:  A T Brünger; G M Clore; A M Gronenborn; R Saffrich; M Nilges
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Essential dynamics of proteins.

Authors:  A Amadei; A B Linssen; H J Berendsen
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-12
View more
  11 in total

1.  Analysis methods for identifying coordinated movements during ligand unbinding.

Authors:  P L Chau; P W A Howe
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Reweighted atomic densities to represent ensembles of NMR structures.

Authors:  Charles D Schwieters; G Marius Clore
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Distributions of experimental protein structures on coarse-grained free energy landscapes.

Authors:  Kannan Sankar; Jie Liu; Yuan Wang; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Close correspondence between the motions from principal component analysis of multiple HIV-1 protease structures and elastic network modes.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Guang Song; Alicia Carriquiry; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Principal component analysis of native ensembles of biomolecular structures (PCA_NEST): insights into functional dynamics.

Authors:  Lee-Wei Yang; Eran Eyal; Ivet Bahar; Akio Kitao
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  The use of experimental structures to model protein dynamics.

Authors:  Ataur R Katebi; Kannan Sankar; Kejue Jia; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

Review 7.  Modeling of Protein Structural Flexibility and Large-Scale Dynamics: Coarse-Grained Simulations and Elastic Network Models.

Authors:  Sebastian Kmiecik; Maksim Kouza; Aleksandra E Badaczewska-Dawid; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Andrzej Kolinski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Understanding the structural degradation of South American historical silk: A Focal Plane Array (FPA) FTIR and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Diego Badillo-Sanchez; David Chelazzi; Rodorico Giorgi; Alessandra Cincinelli; Piero Baglioni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Identification of native protein structures captured by principal interactions.

Authors:  Mehdi Mirzaie
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Protein-Corona-by-Design in 2D: A Reliable Platform to Decode Bio-Nano Interactions for the Next-Generation Quality-by-Design Nanomedicines.

Authors:  Kuo-Ching Mei; Artur Ghazaryan; Er Zhen Teoh; Huw D Summers; Yueting Li; Belén Ballesteros; Justyna Piasecka; Adam Walters; Robert C Hider; Volker Mailänder; Khuloud T Al-Jamal
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 30.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.