Literature DB >> 10598470

The material-weight illusion revisited.

R R Ellis1, S J Lederman.   

Abstract

Experiment 1 documents modality effects on the material-weight illusion for a low-mass object set (58.5 g). These modality effects indicate that the material-weight illusion is principally a haptically derived phenomenon: Haptically accessed material cues were both sufficient and necessary for full-strength illusions, whereas visually accessed material cues were only sufficient to generate moderate-strength illusions. In contrast, when a high-mass object set (357 g) was presented under the same modality conditions, no illusions were generated. The mass-dependent characteristic of this illusion is considered to be a consequence of differing grip forces. Experiment 2 demonstrates that the enforcement of a firm grip abolishes the low-mass material-weight illusion. Experiment 3 documents that a firm grip also diminishes perceptual differentiation of actual mass differences. Several possible explanations of the consequences of increasing grip force are considered.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10598470     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  25 in total

1.  Heaviness perception. III. Weight/aperture in the discernment of heaviness in cubes haptically perceived by thumb-index finger grasp.

Authors:  Satoru Kawai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Heaviness perception. IV. Weight x aperture -1 as a heaviness model in finger-grasp perception.

Authors:  Satoru Kawai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effect of weight-related labels on corticospinal excitability during observation of grasping: a TMS study.

Authors:  Patrice Senot; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Michele Franca; Luana Caselli; Laila Craighero; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

Review 7.  Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Evidence of SQUARC and distance effects in a weight comparison task.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Michele Vicovaro
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-02-05

9.  How soft is that pillow? The perceptual localization of the hand and the haptic assessment of contact rigidity.

Authors:  Assaf Pressman; Amir Karniel; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Somatosensory Perception of Running Shoe Mass may be influenced by Extended Wearing Time or Inclusion of a Personal Reference Shoe, Depending on Testing Method.

Authors:  James G Saxton; Benjamin R Mardis; Christopher L Kliethermes; David S Senchina
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.