Literature DB >> 21525300

How soft is that pillow? The perceptual localization of the hand and the haptic assessment of contact rigidity.

Assaf Pressman1, Amir Karniel, Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi.   

Abstract

A new haptic illusion is described, in which the location of the mobile object affects the perception of its rigidity. There is theoretical and experimental support for the notion that limb position sense results from the brain combining ongoing sensory information with expectations arising from prior experience. How does this probabilistic state information affect one's tactile perception of the environment mechanics? In a simple estimation process, human subjects were asked to report the relative rigidity of two simulated virtual objects. One of the objects remained fixed in space and had various coefficients of stiffness. The other virtual object had constant stiffness but moved with respect to the subjects. Earlier work suggested that the perception of an object's rigidity is consistent with a process of regression between the contact force and the perceived amount of penetration inside the object's boundary. The amount of penetration perceived by the subject was affected by varying the position of the object. This, in turn, had a predictable effect on the perceived rigidity of the contact. Subjects' reports on the relative rigidity of the object are best accounted for by a probabilistic model in which the perceived boundary of the object is estimated based on its current location and on past observations. Therefore, the perception of contact rigidity is accounted for by a stochastic process of state estimation underlying proprioceptive localization of the hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21525300      PMCID: PMC3108063          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4656-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  27 in total

1.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Model comparison of generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Xin-Yuan Song; Sik-Yum Lee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort.

Authors:  Jeremy L Emken; Raul Benitez; Athanasios Sideris; James E Bobrow; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect.

Authors:  K G Munhall; P Gribble; L Sacco; M Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

6.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The cutaneous "rabbit": a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  F A Geldard; C E Sherrick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Tactual discrimination of softness.

Authors:  M A Srinivasan; R H LaMotte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Somatosensory evoked potentials during a rubber-hand illusion in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Avi Peled; Assaf Pressman; Amir B Geva; Ilan Modai
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Switching in Feedforward Control of Grip Force During Tool-Mediated Interaction With Elastic Force Fields.

Authors:  Olivier White; Amir Karniel; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Marie Barbiero; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.650

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.