Literature DB >> 23088507

Auditory discrimination of frequency ratios: the octave singularity.

Damien Bonnard1, Christophe Micheyl, Catherine Semal, René Dauman, Laurent Demany.   

Abstract

Sensitivity to frequency ratios is essential for the perceptual processing of complex sounds and the appreciation of music. This study assessed the effect of ratio simplicity on ratio discrimination for pure tones presented either simultaneously or sequentially. Each stimulus consisted of four 100-ms pure tones, equally spaced in terms of frequency ratio and presented at a low intensity to limit interactions in the auditory periphery. Listeners had to discriminate between a reference frequency ratio of 0.97 octave (about 1.96:1) and target frequency ratios, which were larger than the reference. In the simultaneous condition, the obtained psychometric functions were nonmonotonic: as the target frequency ratio increased from 0.98 octave to 1.04 octaves, discrimination performance initially increased, then decreased, and then increased again; performance was better when the target was exactly one octave (2:1) than when the target was slightly larger. In the sequential condition, by contrast, the psychometric functions were monotonic and there was no effect of frequency ratio simplicity. A control experiment verified that the non-monotonicity observed in the simultaneous condition did not originate from peripheral interactions between the tones. Our results indicate that simultaneous octaves are recognized as "special" frequency intervals by a mechanism that is insensitive to the sign (positive or negative) of deviations from the octave, whereas this is apparently not the case for sequential octaves. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088507      PMCID: PMC3905309          DOI: 10.1037/a0030095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  43 in total

1.  A possible neurophysiological basis of the octave enlargement effect.

Authors:  M F McKinney; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Separate mechanisms govern the selection of spectral components for perceptual fusion and for the computation of global pitch.

Authors:  J M Brunstrom; B Roberts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The case of the missing pitch templates: how harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system.

Authors:  S Shamma; D Klein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

5.  Perceptual fusion and fragmentation of complex tones made inharmonic by applying different degrees of frequency shift and spectral stretch.

Authors:  B Roberts; J M Brunstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spectral pattern, harmonic relations, and the perceptual grouping of low-numbered components.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Dichotic beats of mistuned consonances.

Authors:  M P Feeney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of frequency ratio on infants' and adults' discrimination of simultaneous intervals.

Authors:  L J Trainor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Triadic comparisons of musical intervals.

Authors:  W J Levelt; J P van de Geer; R Plomp
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  Beats of mistuned consonances.

Authors:  R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evolution of tonal organization in music mirrors symbolic representation of perceptual reality. Part-1: Prehistoric.

Authors:  Aleksey Nikolsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-16

2.  Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Damien Bonnard; Adam Schwalje; Bruce Gantz; Inyong Choi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Nonspecific hebbian neural network model predicts musical scales discreteness and just intonation without using octave-equivalency mapping.

Authors:  Toso Pankovski; Ana Pankovska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  The 1.06 frequency ratio in the cochlea: evidence and outlook for a natural musical semitone.

Authors:  Andrew Bell; W Wiktor Jedrzejczak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.