Literature DB >> 8934852

View specificity in object processing: evidence from picture matching.

R Lawson1, G W Humphreys.   

Abstract

Four experiments investigated the types of representations mediating sequential visual matching of objects depicted at different depth rotations. Matching performance was affected by the similarity between depicted views of the objects. Effects of view similarity were not influenced by the presence of a meaningless mask in the interstimulus interval (ISI), but they were reduced by long ISIs and by familiarity with the stimuli. It is suggested that with longer ISIs or increased stimulus familiarity, a number of object representations are activated that, although abstracted from some image characteristics, remain view specific. Under these conditions, matching is less reliant on representations closely tied to the view of the initial stimulus presented. The results are consistent with both the derivation and the long-term representation of view-specific rather than view-invariant descriptions of objects.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934852     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.2.395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems.

Authors:  E D Burgund; C J Marsolek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

3.  Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views.

Authors:  David H Foster; Stuart J Gilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  View sensitivity increases for same-shape matches if mismatches show pairs of more similar shapes.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

5.  Perception isn't so simple: commentary on Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, and Klein (2012).

Authors:  Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-18

6.  Picture perfect: A stimulus set of 225 pairs of matched clipart and photographic images normed by Mechanical Turk and laboratory participants.

Authors:  Raheleh Saryazdi; Julie Bannon; Agatha Rodrigues; Chris Klammer; Craig G Chambers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-12

7.  Earlier development of analytical than holistic object recognition in adolescence.

Authors:  Elley Wakui; Martin Jüttner; Dean Petters; Surinder Kaur; John E Hummel; Jules Davidoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Orientation sensitivity at different stages of object processing: evidence from repetition priming and naming.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Paul E Dux; Claire T Benito; E Charles Leek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Flexible Orientation Tuning of Visual Representations of Human Body Postures: Evidence From Long-Term Priming.

Authors:  Karl Verfaillie; Anja Daems
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-10

10.  The Post-verbal Effect of Negators in Mongolian Contradictory Negations Provides Support for the Fusion Model.

Authors:  Qinghong Xu; Shujun Zhang; Jie Li; Baizhou Wu; Helin Qiu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.