Literature DB >> 24203658

Imagining and naming rotated natural objects.

J E Murray1.   

Abstract

The present experiment examined whether subjects can form and store imagined objects in various orientations. Subjects in a training phase named line drawings of natural objects shown at six orientations, named objects shown upright, or imagined upright objects at six orientations. Time to imagine an upright object at another orientation increased the farther the designated orientation was from the upright, with faster image formation times at 180° than at 120°. Similar systematic patterns of effects of orientation on identification time were found for rotated objects. During the test phase, all subjects named the previously experienced objects as well as new objects, at six orientations. The orientation effect for old objects seen previously in a variety of orientations was much reduced relative to the orientation effect for new objects. In contrast, substantial effects of orientation on naming time were observed for old objects for subjects who had previously seen the objects upright only or upright but imagined at different orientations. The results suggest that the attenuation of initially large effects of orientation with practice cannot be due to imagining and forming representations of objects at a number of orientations.

Year:  1995        PMID: 24203658     DOI: 10.3758/BF03210963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the tops of rotated objects.

Authors:  P A McMullen; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; B Milliken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition.

Authors:  M J Tarr; S Pinker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Naming and locating the tops of rotated pictures.

Authors:  R H Maki
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

5.  Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1988-12

6.  Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects.

Authors:  J E Murray; P Jolicoeur; P A McMullen; M Ingleton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-09

7.  The role of attention in the shift from orientation-dependent to orientation-invariant identification of disoriented objects.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-01

8.  On misoriented letters.

Authors:  P Bressan; G B Vicario
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  The time to name disoriented natural objects.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-07

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  The effect of prior experience on recognition thresholds for plane-disoriented pictures of familiar objects.

Authors:  R Lawson; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

3.  The role of meaning and familiarity in mental transformations.

Authors:  W Smith; I E Dror
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

4.  Negative priming by rotated objects.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

5.  Flipping and spinning: spatial transformation procedures in the identification of rotated natural objects.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-01

6.  Components of action representations evoked when identifying manipulable objects.

Authors:  Daniel N Bub; Michael E J Masson; Terry Lin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The role of perceptual load in object recognition.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Zhicheng Lin; Nahid Zokaei; Volker Thoma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Orientation sensitivity at different stages of object processing: evidence from repetition priming and naming.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Paul E Dux; Claire T Benito; E Charles Leek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.