Literature DB >> 10519708

Confirmation of deafness in infancy.

P M Watkin1, M Baldwin.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess delay in confirming hearing impairment in infants identified by universal neonatal screening and to investigate the causes. PATIENTS: Infants identified from 25 199 babies screened from January 1992 to December 1997.
METHODS: A two stage transient evoked oto-acoustic emission test (TEOAE), with a threshold auditory brainstem response (ABR) recording undertaken on those who failed. The screen identified infants with a permanent congenital hearing impairment (PCHI) averaging 40 dBnHL or worse in the best ear. Those with less impairment were also ascertained. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the ABR test and measures of delay between identification and eventual diagnosis were analysed.
RESULTS: A targeted PCHI was found in 1.18/1000 neonates. The PPV of the ABR for confirming a targeted PCHI was 100% when the ABR threshold was >/= 80 dBnHL. Nine of 11 infants with this threshold had severe or profound permanent deafness. The delay from ABR to audiological certainty was about 1 month-diagnosis was confirmed around 3 months. There was uncertainty when the ABR was 40-80 dBnHL. The PPV was 60% and 8% when the ABR thresholds were 70 dBnHL and 50 dBnHL, respectively. 85 of 111 infants with ABR thresholds in this range had a temporary conductive impairment. Their early diagnosis depended upon the type and degree of hearing impairment and diagnosis was delayed to about 8 months in these infants.
CONCLUSIONS: Hearing impairments identified by universal screening are delayed in all but those with severe or profound bilateral PCHI. This delay can be reduced by applying in early infancy a battery of audiological tests and requires further exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10519708      PMCID: PMC1718132          DOI: 10.1136/adc.81.5.380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  11 in total

1.  Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Otoacoustic emission versus ABR screening: the effect of external and middle ear abnormalities in a group of SCBU neonates.

Authors:  A El-Refaie; D J Parker; J M Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1996-02

3.  The neonatal acoustic reflex.

Authors:  L A Weatherby; M J Bennett
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1980

4.  Hearing screening by health visitors: a critical appraisal of the distraction test.

Authors:  B McCormick
Journal:  Health Visit       Date:  1983-12

5.  Outcomes of neonatal screening for hearing loss by otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 6.  Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review.

Authors:  D R Stapells; P Oates
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Response of infants and young children as a function of auditory stimuli and test methods.

Authors:  M Thompson; G Thompson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1972-12

8.  Tympanometry in the diagnosis of middle-ear effusion.

Authors:  P A Shurin; S I Pelton; J Finkelstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions in a cohort of special care neonates.

Authors:  G J Sutton; P Gleadle; S J Rowe
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1996-02

10.  Screening of hearing impairment in the newborn using the auditory response cradle.

Authors:  S M Tucker; J Bhattacharya
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.

Authors:  C R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Measuring the prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment.

Authors:  S Russ
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

Review 3.  Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice.

Authors:  C Kennedy; D McCann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project. Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (part II).

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Thomas Wiesner; Holger Drews; Frank Müller; Achim Breitfuss; Regina Schiller; Markus Hess
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  High frequency tympanometry in neonates with normal otoacoustic emissions: measurements and interpretations.

Authors:  Arvinder Singh Sood; Charanjit Singh Bons; Gursharan Singh Narang
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-09-04

6.  Growth and neurosensory outcomes of preterm very low birth weight infants at 18 months of corrected age.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar Sharma; M Jeeva Sankar; Savita Sapra; Rohit Saxena; C Venkat Karthikeyan; Ashok Deorari; Ramesh Agarwal; Vinod Paul
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study.

Authors:  H M Fortnum; A Q Summerfield; D H Marshall; A C Davis; J M Bamford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

8.  The Influence of Hearing Aid Use on Outcomes of Children With Mild Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Lenore Holte; Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Thomas Page; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 9.  Hearing screening and diagnostic evaluation of children with unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Danielle S Ross; W June Holstrum; Marcus Gaffney; Denise Green; Robert F Oyler; Judith S Gravel
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-03

10.  Economic evaluation of newborn hearing screening: modelling costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Franz Hessel; Eva Grill; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Uwe Siebert; Silke Kunze; Andreas Nickisch; Hubertus von Voss; Jürgen Wasem
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2003-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.