Literature DB >> 8653430

Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness.

P M Watkin1.   

Abstract

Using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), a two stage screen with the testing of failures by auditory brainstem response (ABR), has been implemented in Whipps Cross Hospital in East London. From January 1992 to 1995, 11,606 infants received an initial TEOAE test. Once initial difficulties were resolved, coverage of district residents remained stable at 91.5%. Long term follow up of the cohort is being undertaken. Of those receiving an initial test, 13% failed in both ears. Only 1.75% of the cohort failed both stages of the TEOAE screen bilaterally. These infants were tested by ABR. The yield of infants with a bilateral permanent hearing loss of moderate or worse degree was 2/1000. The overall cost of implementing the programme was not prohibitive and the cost per hearing impaired child detected was little more than the widely accepted notional cost of identifying such children through targeted at risk screens. The screen was clearly sensitive. The priority for such universal TEOAE programmes, however, is to increase specificity without losing this sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8653430      PMCID: PMC2528325          DOI: 10.1136/fn.74.1.f16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  17 in total

Review 1.  Hearing screening in children--state of the art(s)

Authors:  M P Haggard
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Screening infants for hearing loss.

Authors:  J Brown; E Watson; E Alberman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn.

Authors:  C R Kennedy; L Kimm; D C Dees; P I Evans; M Hunter; S Lenton; R D Thornton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Click evoked otoacoustic emissions compared with brain stem electric response.

Authors:  J C Stevens; H D Webb; J Hutchinson; J Connell; M F Smith; J T Buffin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D T Kemp; S Ryan; P Bray
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Parental suspicion and identification of hearing impairment.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin; S Laoide
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening.

Authors:  P Bray; D Kemp
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1987-08

9.  The age of identification of childhood deafness--improvements since the 1970s.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.427

10.  Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin; G McEnery
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.

Authors:  C R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Community based universal neonatal hearing screening by health visitors using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  M Owen; M Webb; K Evans
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Universal hearing screening using transient otoacoustic emissions in a community health clinic.

Authors:  H M Bantock; S Croxson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening (OAE) for deafness: psychological costs.

Authors:  D V Lang
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Outcomes of neonatal screening for hearing loss by otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  The costs of early hearing screening in England and Wales.

Authors:  J C Stevens; D M Hall; A Davis; C M Davies; S Dixon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Confirmation of deafness in infancy.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Low prevalence of hearing impairment among very low birthweight infants as detected by universal neonatal hearing screening.

Authors:  D Ari-Even Roth; M Hildesheimer; A Maayan-Metzger; C Muchnik; A Hamburger; R Mazkeret; J Kuint
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.747

9.  Economic evaluation of newborn hearing screening: modelling costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Franz Hessel; Eva Grill; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Uwe Siebert; Silke Kunze; Andreas Nickisch; Hubertus von Voss; Jürgen Wasem
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2003-12-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.