Literature DB >> 21769525

Growth and neurosensory outcomes of preterm very low birth weight infants at 18 months of corrected age.

Pradeep Kumar Sharma1, M Jeeva Sankar, Savita Sapra, Rohit Saxena, C Venkat Karthikeyan, Ashok Deorari, Ramesh Agarwal, Vinod Paul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the growth and neurosensory outcomes of infants with birth weight ≤ 1,500 g or gestation ≤ 32 wks at 18 months corrected age. This prospective cohort study was conducted at a Level III neonatal unit in India. The neonates with birth weight ≤ 1,500 g or gestation ≤ 32 wks were included in the study.
METHODS: The infants were followed up at 3,6,9,12 and 18 months corrected age. Weight, length and head circumference were plotted on WHO multisite growth reference study (MGRS) charts. Neurological examination was conducted by Amiel-Tison method, hearing was evaluated with brainstem auditory evoked responses, vision assessed with Teller acuity cards, and development assessed with Developmental Assessment Scales for Indian Infants II.
RESULTS: During the period from July 2006 through June 2007, there were 141 neonates born at gestation ≤ 32 wks or birth weight ≤ 1,500 g. Seven infants had major malformations, 30 died before discharge, 36 had residence > 20 km and parents of four had refused consent. The remaining 64 neonates were enrolled for follow up. The mean gestation and birth weight were 31(2.4) wks and 1208 (365) g respectively. There were 38 (59%) small for gestation infants. Fifty-five infants completed 18 months follow up for growth outcomes. Seventeen (30.9%; 95% CI 18.3% to 43.5%) infants were undernourished, 28(50.9%; 95% CI 37.3% to 64.6%) were stunted, 8(14.5%; 95% CI 0 to 24) were wasted and 14(25.4%; 95% CI 13.6% to 37.3%) had microcephaly. Infants with birth weight <1,000 g (n = 17) were significantly more affected. Ten (58.8%; p < 0.01) were undernourished, 13(76.5%; p < 0.01) were stunted and 10(58.8%; p < 0.01) had microcephaly. Complete formal neurological evaluation for development, hearing and vision was done in 31 infants. Six of these 31 (19.3%; 95% CI 4.6% to 34.1%) infants had one or more major disabilities. These included cerebral palsy (n = 3), developmental delay (development quotient <70, n = 3), and deafness (n = 3).
CONCLUSIONS: Very low birth weight infants are at a high risk of neurosensory disability and growth failure. There is a need to create a nation-wide database of these infants for neurodevelopment and growth outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21769525     DOI: 10.1007/s12098-011-0442-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   1.967


  12 in total

Review 1.  Neuropsychological and functional outcomes of very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  B R Vohr; M E Msall
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Outcome among surviving very low birthweight infants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G J Escobar; B Littenberg; D B Petitti
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  The Barker hypothesis: how pediatricans will diagnose and prevent common adult-onset diseases.

Authors:  George J Dover
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2009

4.  Pune low birth weight study--a six year follow up.

Authors:  S Chaudhari; M R Bhalerao; A Chitale; A N Pandit; U Nene
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.411

5.  Follow up studies during the first five years of life: a pervasive assessment of neurological function.

Authors:  C Amiel-Tison; A Stewart
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Neurologic sequelae in high risk infants--a three year follow up.

Authors:  S Chaudhari; S Kulkarni; S Barve; A N Pandit; U Sonak; N Sarpotdar
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.411

7.  Confirmation of deafness in infancy.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Incidence of periventricular leucomalacia among a cohort of very low birth weight neonates(< 1500 g).

Authors:  Arti Maria; Arun Gupta; Rajiv Aggarwal; V Sreenivas; V K Paul; A K Deorari
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.411

9.  Pune low birth weight study--cognitive abilities and educational performance at twelve years.

Authors:  Sudha Chaudhari; Madhumati Otiv; Anjali Chitale; Anand Pandit; Mahendra Hoge
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.411

Review 10.  Neonatal intensive care: is it worth it? Developmental sequelae of very low birthweight.

Authors:  J A Blackman
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.278

View more
  5 in total

1.  Trends and outcome of low birth weight (LBW) infants in India.

Authors:  B Vishnu Bhat; B Adhisivam
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Investigation of genetic risk factors for chronic adult diseases for association with preterm birth.

Authors:  Nadia Falah; Jude McElroy; Victoria Snegovskikh; Charles J Lockwood; Errol Norwitz; Jeffey C Murray; Edward Kuczynski; Ramkumar Menon; Kari Teramo; Louis J Muglia; Thomas Morgan
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial.

Authors:  Shuchita Gupta; Ramesh Agarwal; Kailash Chandra Aggarwal; Harish Chellani; Anil Duggal; Sugandha Arya; Sunita Bhatia; Mari Jeeva Sankar; Vishnubhatla Sreenivas; Vandana Jain; Arun Kumar Gupta; Ashok K Deorari; Vinod K Paul
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 26.763

4.  First-year growth of 834 preterm infants in a Chinese population: a single-center study.

Authors:  Ying Deng; Fan Yang; Dezhi Mu
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 5.  Methods to quantify soft tissue-based cranial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sander Brons; Machteld E van Beusichem; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Jos M Draaisma; Stefaan J Bergé; Jan G Schols; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.