Literature DB >> 1519957

Screening of hearing impairment in the newborn using the auditory response cradle.

S M Tucker1, J Bhattacharya.   

Abstract

The Auditory Response Cradle (ARC) is a fully automated microprocessor controlled machine that was designed for the hearing screening of full term neonates. In order to evaluate the ARC, 6000 babies were screened at a district maternity hospital over a period of three years. Every infant subsequently entered a three year follow up programme. One hundred and two babies (1.7%) failed the ARC screen (that is, they failed two ARC tests) and 20 of these were found to have some hearing impairment: in 10 it was severe (80-90 dBHL), in seven moderate (45-60 dBHL), and in three it was mild to moderate (less than 45 dBHL). In addition, of the 20 babies who failed a first test and were discharged before a second could be performed, two were confirmed to have a severe hearing loss; 79 infants failing the screen were cleared on further testing, giving the ARC a false positive rate of 1.3%. On following up all 6000 infants for three years, seven children who passed the neonatal screen were subsequently found to have a hearing loss. For two babies the aetiology was unknown but for five the hearing impairment was either due to a hereditary progressive loss or definite postnatal factors. Progressive and acquired hearing losses cannot be detected at a neonatal screen and this emphasises the need for follow up screens at other stages in the child's life. In this long term study the ARC has been found to have a high detection rate for severe hearing loss and confirms the practical possibility of using a behavioural technique for the universal screening of hearing in neonates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1519957      PMCID: PMC1793851          DOI: 10.1136/adc.67.7.911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in the newborn.

Authors:  J C Stevens; H D Webb; J Hutchinson; J Connell; M F Smith; J T Buffin
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1991-02

Review 2.  High frequency positive pressure ventilation in neonates.

Authors:  A D Milner; E W Hoskyns
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Trials with the auditory response cradle. 1--Neonatal responses to auditory stimuli.

Authors:  M J Bennett
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-11

4.  Auditory screening of special care neonates using the auditory response cradle.

Authors:  B McCormick; D A Curnock; F Spavins
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Childhood deafness in the European community.

Authors:  J A Martin; O Bentzen; J R Colley; D Hennebert; C Holm; S Iurato; G A de Jonge; O McCullen; M L Meyer; W J Moore; A Morgon
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981

6.  Trials with the auditory response cradle III: head turns and startles as auditory responses in the neonate.

Authors:  M J Bennett
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1980-11

7.  An automated hearing screening technique for newborns.

Authors:  W H McFarland; F B Simmons; F R Jones
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1980-11

8.  The assessment of hearing in infancy using the post-auricular myogenic response. Evaluation of an instrument which simplifies its detection.

Authors:  L M Flood; J G Fraser; M J Conway; A Stewart
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1982-11

9.  Hearing loss in very low birthweight infants treated with neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  S J Abramovich; S Gregory; M Slemick; A Stewart
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Hearing disorders in childhood, some procedures for detection, identification and diagnostic evaluation.

Authors:  A Parving
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.675

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.

Authors:  C R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  Neonatal hearing screening.

Authors:  A M Oudesluys-Murphy; H L van Straaten; R Bholasingh; G A van Zanten
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Outcomes of neonatal screening for hearing loss by otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  The costs of early hearing screening in England and Wales.

Authors:  J C Stevens; D M Hall; A Davis; C M Davies; S Dixon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Confirmation of deafness in infancy.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  The impact of universal newborn hearing screening on long-term literacy outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hannah Pimperton; Hazel Blythe; Jana Kreppner; Merle Mahon; Janet L Peacock; Jim Stevenson; Emmanouela Terlektsi; Sarah Worsfold; Ho Ming Yuen; Colin R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.920

8.  Language Outcomes in Deaf or Hard of Hearing Teenagers Who Are Spoken Language Users: Effects of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Early Confirmation.

Authors:  Hannah Pimperton; Jana Kreppner; Merle Mahon; Jim Stevenson; Emmanouela Terlektsi; Sarah Worsfold; Ho Ming Yuen; Colin R Kennedy
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.