Literature DB >> 10511544

Genetic control of recombination partner preference in yeast meiosis. Isolation and characterization of mutants elevated for meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination.

D A Thompson1, F W Stahl.   

Abstract

Meiotic exchange occurs preferentially between homologous chromatids, in contrast to mitotic recombination, which occurs primarily between sister chromatids. To identify functions that direct meiotic recombination events to homologues, we screened for mutants exhibiting an increase in meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination (SCR). The msc (meiotic sister-chromatid recombination) mutants were quantified in spo13 meiosis with respect to meiotic unequal SCR frequency, disome segregation pattern, sporulation frequency, and spore viability. Analysis of the msc mutants according to these criteria defines three classes. Mutants with a class I phenotype identified new alleles of the meiosis-specific genes RED1 and MEK1, the DNA damage checkpoint genes RAD24 and MEC3, and a previously unknown gene, MSC6. The genes RED1, MEK1, RAD24, RAD17, and MEC1 are required for meiotic prophase arrest induced by a dmc1 mutation, which defines a meiotic recombination checkpoint. Meiotic unequal SCR was also elevated in a rad17 mutant. Our observation that meiotic unequal SCR is elevated in meiotic recombination checkpoint mutants suggests that, in addition to their proposed monitoring function, these checkpoint genes function to direct meiotic recombination events to homologues. The mutants in class II, including a dmc1 mutant, confer a dominant meiotic lethal phenotype in diploid SPO13 meiosis in our strain background, and they identify alleles of UBR1, INP52, BUD3, PET122, ELA1, and MSC1-MSC3. These results suggest that DMC1 functions to bias the repair of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks to homologues. We hypothesize that the genes identified by the class II mutants function in or are regulators of the DMC1-promoted interhomologue recombination pathway. Class III mutants may be elevated for rates of both SCR and homologue exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511544      PMCID: PMC1460802     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  81 in total

1.  Karyotype variability in yeast caused by nonallelic recombination in haploid meiosis.

Authors:  J Loidl; K Nairz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway.

Authors:  A Schwacha; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Meiotic recombination hotspots.

Authors:  M Lichten; A S Goldman
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family.

Authors:  S Keeney; C N Giroux; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Meiosis: how could it work?

Authors:  N Kleckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes.

Authors:  D Lydall; Y Nikolsky; D K Bishop; T Weinert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes.

Authors:  A V Smith; G S Roeder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-03-10       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Genetic interactions between HOP1, RED1 and MEK1 suggest that MEK1 regulates assembly of axial element components during meiosis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  N M Hollingsworth; L Ponte
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex.

Authors:  L Xu; B M Weiner; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination.

Authors:  A Bergerat; B de Massy; D Gadelle; P C Varoutas; A Nicolas; P Forterre
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  60 in total

1.  Multiple functions of MutS- and MutL-related heterocomplexes.

Authors:  T Nakagawa; A Datta; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints.

Authors:  V I Bashkirov; J S King; E V Bashkirova; J Schmuckli-Maurer; W D Heyer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway.

Authors:  V Paciotti; M Clerici; M Scotti; G Lucchini; M P Longhese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Role for the silencing protein Dot1 in meiotic checkpoint control.

Authors:  P A San-Segundo; G S Roeder
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Pch2 modulates chromatid partner choice during meiotic double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sarah Zanders; Megan Sonntag Brown; Cheng Chen; Eric Alani
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The genome-wide expression response to telomerase deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shivani Nautiyal; Joseph L DeRisi; Elizabeth H Blackburn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evidence of meiotic crossover control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through Mec1-mediated phosphorylation of replication protein A.

Authors:  Amy J Bartrand; Dagmawi Iyasu; Suzanne M Marinco; George S Brush
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Unequal sister chromatid and homolog recombination at a tandem duplication of the A1 locus in maize.

Authors:  Marna D Yandeau-Nelson; Yiji Xia; Jin Li; M Gerald Neuffer; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Chromosome-wide regulation of meiotic crossover formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires properly assembled chromosome axes.

Authors:  Kentaro Nabeshima; Anne M Villeneuve; Kenneth J Hillers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Mek1 kinase activity functions downstream of RED1 in the regulation of meiotic double strand break repair in budding yeast.

Authors:  Lihong Wan; Teresa de los Santos; Chao Zhang; Kevan Shokat; Nancy M Hollingsworth
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.