Literature DB >> 10825202

DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints.

V I Bashkirov1, J S King, E V Bashkirova, J Schmuckli-Maurer, W D Heyer.   

Abstract

Checkpoints, which are integral to the cellular response to DNA damage, coordinate transient cell cycle arrest and the induced expression of DNA repair genes after genotoxic stress. DNA repair ensures cellular survival and genomic stability, utilizing a multipathway network. Here we report evidence that the two systems, DNA damage checkpoint control and DNA repair, are directly connected by demonstrating that the Rad55 double-strand break repair protein of the recombinational repair pathway is a terminal substrate of DNA damage and replication block checkpoints. Rad55p was specifically phosphorylated in response to DNA damage induced by the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate, dependent on an active DNA damage checkpoint. Rad55p modification was also observed after gamma ray and UV radiation. The rapid time course of phosphorylation and the recombination defects identified in checkpoint-deficient cells are consistent with a role of the DNA damage checkpoint in activating recombinational repair. Rad55p phosphorylation possibly affects the balance between different competing DNA repair pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10825202      PMCID: PMC85806          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.12.4393-4404.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  89 in total

1.  RAD50 and RAD51 define two pathways that collaborate to maintain telomeres in the absence of telomerase.

Authors:  S Le; J K Moore; J E Haber; C W Greider
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  A Emili
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture.

Authors:  G Bosco; J E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis.

Authors:  S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  A G Paulovich; R U Margulies; B M Garvik; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  MEC1-dependent redistribution of the Sir3 silencing protein from telomeres to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  K D Mills; D A Sinclair; L Guarente
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-05-28       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma.

Authors:  Y Xu; T Ashley; E E Brainerd; R T Bronson; M S Meyn; D Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways.

Authors:  Z Sun; D S Fay; F Marini; M Foiani; D F Stern
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage.

Authors:  J E Vialard; C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  63 in total

1.  The Aspergillus nidulans musN gene encodes a RecQ helicase that interacts with the PI-3K-related kinase UVSB.

Authors:  A F Hofmann; S D Harris
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Replication protein A is sequentially phosphorylated during meiosis.

Authors:  G S Brush; D M Clifford; S M Marinco; A J Bartrand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Homologous DNA recombination in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  E Sonoda; M Takata; Y M Yamashita; C Morrison; S Takeda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kyungjae Myung; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  UV irradiation causes the loss of viable mitotic recombinants in Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells lacking the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Fekret Osman; Irina R Tsaneva; Matthew C Whitby; Claudette L Doe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway.

Authors:  V Paciotti; M Clerici; M Scotti; G Lucchini; M P Longhese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Navigating the nucleotide excision repair threshold.

Authors:  Liren Liu; Jennifer Lee; Pengbo Zhou
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates recombinational repair protein Rad60.

Authors:  Michael N Boddy; Paul Shanahan; W Hayes McDonald; Antonia Lopez-Girona; Eishi Noguchi; John R Yates III; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Mus81-Mms4 functions as a single heterodimer to cleave nicked intermediates in recombinational DNA repair.

Authors:  Erin K Schwartz; William D Wright; Kirk T Ehmsen; James E Evans; Henning Stahlberg; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Contrasting roles of checkpoint proteins as recombination modulators at Fob1-Ter complexes with or without fork arrest.

Authors:  Bidyut K Mohanty; Narendra K Bairwa; Deepak Bastia
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.