Literature DB >> 11359899

Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway.

V Paciotti1, M Clerici, M Scotti, G Lucchini, M P Longhese.   

Abstract

DNA damage checkpoints lead to the inhibition of cell cycle progression following DNA damage. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1 checkpoint protein, a phosphatidylinositol kinase-related protein, is required for transient cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage or DNA replication defects. We show that mec1 kinase-deficient (mec1kd) mutants are indistinguishable from mec1Delta cells, indicating that the Mec1 conserved kinase domain is required for all known Mec1 functions, including cell viability and proper DNA damage response. Mec1kd variants maintain the ability to physically interact with both Ddc2 and wild-type Mec1 and cause dominant checkpoint defects when overproduced in MEC1 cells, impairing the ability of cells to slow down S phase entry and progression after DNA damage in G(1) or during S phase. Conversely, an excess of Mec1kd in MEC1 cells does not abrogate the G(2)/M checkpoint, suggesting that Mec1 functions required for response to aberrant DNA structures during specific cell cycle stages can be separable. In agreement with this hypothesis, we describe two new hypomorphic mec1 mutants that are completely defective in the G(1)/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints but properly delay nuclear division after UV irradiation in G(2). The finding that these mutants, although indistinguishable from mec1Delta cells with respect to the ability to replicate a damaged DNA template, do not lose viability after UV light and methyl methanesulfonate treatment suggests that checkpoint impairments do not necessarily result in hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11359899      PMCID: PMC87054          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.12.3913-3925.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  63 in total

1.  A sliding clamp model for the Rad1 family of cell cycle checkpoint proteins.

Authors:  M P Thelen; C Venclovas; K Fidelis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-03-19       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Role of a complex containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the yeast DNA damage checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  T Kondo; K Matsumoto; K Sugimoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  S Waga; B Stillman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 4.  DNA end-joining: from yeast to man.

Authors:  S E Critchlow; S P Jackson
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 5.  DNA damage and checkpoint pathways: molecular anatomy and interactions with repair.

Authors:  T Weinert
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-09-04       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Radiation-induced assembly of Rad51 and Rad52 recombination complex requires ATM and c-Abl.

Authors:  G Chen; S S Yuan; W Liu; Y Xu; K Trujillo; B Song; F Cong; S P Goff; Y Wu; R Arlinghaus; D Baltimore; P J Gasser; M S Park; P Sung; E Y Lee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines.

Authors:  M Knop; K Siegers; G Pereira; W Zachariae; B Winsor; K Nasmyth; E Schiebel
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.239

8.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  B A Desany; A A Alcasabas; J B Bachant; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools.

Authors:  X Zhao; E G Muller; R Rothstein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage.

Authors:  J E Vialard; C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  61 in total

1.  The contribution of the S-phase checkpoint genes MEC1 and SGS1 to genome stability maintenance in Candida albicans.

Authors:  Melanie Legrand; Christine L Chan; Peter A Jauert; David T Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  A subset of ATM- and ATR-dependent phosphorylation events requires the BRCA1 protein.

Authors:  Nicolas Foray; Didier Marot; Anastasia Gabriel; Voahangy Randrianarison; Antony M Carr; Michel Perricaudet; Alan Ashworth; Penny Jeggo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-06-02       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  A Ddc2-Rad53 fusion protein can bypass the requirements for RAD9 and MRC1 in Rad53 activation.

Authors:  Soo-Jung Lee; Jimmy K Duong; David F Stern
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast.

Authors:  Anthony Admire; Lisa Shanks; Nicole Danzl; Mei Wang; Ulli Weier; William Stevens; Elizabeth Hunt; Ted Weinert
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Mcl1p is a polymerase alpha replication accessory factor important for S-phase DNA damage survival.

Authors:  Dewight R Williams; J R McIntosh
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2005-01

6.  UV irradiation induces a postreplication DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  A John Callegari; Thomas J Kelly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gradual implementation of the meiotic recombination program via checkpoint pathways controlled by global DSB levels.

Authors:  Neeraj Joshi; M Scott Brown; Douglas K Bishop; G Valentin Börner
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response.

Authors:  Laure Crabbé; Aubin Thomas; Véronique Pantesco; John De Vos; Philippe Pasero; Armelle Lengronne
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 9.  Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication.

Authors:  R A Sclafani; T M Holzen
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  The unstructured C-terminal tail of the 9-1-1 clamp subunit Ddc1 activates Mec1/ATR via two distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Vasundhara M Navadgi-Patil; Peter M Burgers
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.