Literature DB >> 10501053

Relative dosimetry using active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) technology.

Y El-Mohri1, L E Antonuk, J Yorkston, K W Jee, M Maolinbay, K L Lam, J H Siewerdsen.   

Abstract

The first examination of the use of active matrix flat-panel arrays for dosimetry in radiotherapy is reported. Such arrays are under widespread development for diagnostic and radiotherapy imaging. In the current study, an array consisting of 512 x 512 pixels with a pixel pitch of 508 microm giving an area of 26 x 26 cm2 has been used. Each pixel consists of a light sensitive amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) photodiode coupled to an a-Si:H thin-film transistor. Data was obtained from the array using a dedicated electronics system allowing real-time data acquisition. In order to examine the potential of such arrays as quality assurance devices for radiotherapy beams, field profile data at photon energies of 6 and 15 MV were obtained as a function of field size and thickness of overlying absorbing material (solid water). Two detection configurations using the array were considered: a configuration (similar to the imaging configuration) in which an overlying phosphor screen is used to convert incident radiation to visible light photons which are detected by the photodiodes; and a configuration without the screen where radiation is directly sensed by the photodiodes. Compared to relative dosimetry data obtained with an ion chamber, data taken using the former configuration exhibited significant differences whereas data obtained using the latter configuration was generally found to be in close agreement. Basic signal properties, which are pertinent to dosimetry, have been investigated through measurements of individual pixel response for fluoroscopic and radiographic array operation. For signal levels acquired within the first 25% of pixel charge capacity, the degree of linear response with dose was found to be better than 99%. The independence of signal on dose rate was demonstrated by means of stability of pixel response over the range of dose rates allowed by the radiation source (80-400 MU/min). Finally, excellent long-term stability in pixel response, extending over a 2 month period, was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10501053     DOI: 10.1118/1.598649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Beam rate influence on dose distribution and fluence map in IMRT dynamic technique.

Authors:  Krzysztof Slosarek; Aleksandra Grządziel; Wojciech Osewski; Lukasz Dolla; Barbara Bekman; Borislava Petrovic
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-02-10

2.  A Monte Carlo study of the impact of phosphor optical properties on EPID imaging performance.

Authors:  Mengying Shi; Marios Myronakis; Yue-Houng Hu; Daniel Morf; Joerg Rottmann; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  In patient dose reconstruction using a cine acquisition for dynamic arc radiation therapy.

Authors:  Angelo Piermattei; Andrea Fidanzio; Luigi Azario; Francesca Greco; Alessandra Mameli; Savino Cilla; Luca Grimaldi; Guido D'Onofrio; Boris Giuseppe Augelli; Gerardina Stimato; Diego Gaudino; Sara Ramella; Rolando D'Angelillo; Francesco Cellini; Lucio Trodella
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  EPID in vivo dosimetry in RapidArc technique.

Authors:  Krzysztof Slosarek; Marta Szlag; Barbara Bekman; Aleksandra Grzadziel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2010-02-20

5.  A rapid, accurate image simulation strategy for mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Mengying Shi; Marios Myronakis; Matthew Jacobson; Mathias Lehmann; Dianne Ferguson; Paul Baturin; Pascal Huber; Rony Fueglistaller; Thomas Harris; Ingrid Valencia Lozano; Christopher Williams; Daniel Morf; Ross I Berbeco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.174

6.  Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.

Authors:  Michael P Barnes; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Impact of backscattered radiation from the bunker structure on EPID dosimetry.

Authors:  Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Mahsheed Sabet; Daryl J O'Connor; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Clinical Experience of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Pre-Treatment Quality Assurance for Carcinoma Head and Neck Patients with EPID and IMatriXX in Rural Center.

Authors:  More M; Jain V; Gurjar O P
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-12-01

9.  Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery.

Authors:  S Timothy Peace Balasingh; I Rabi Raja Singh; K Mohamathu Rafic; S Ebenezer Suman Babu; B Paul Ravindran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

10.  An empirical model of electronic portal imager response implemented within a commercial treatment planning system for verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy fields.

Authors:  Rao F H Khan; Orest Z Ostapiak; Joe J Szabo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.