Literature DB >> 10491697

Perceptual segregation and pitch shifts of mistuned components in harmonic complexes and in regular inharmonic complexes.

B Roberts1, J M Brunstrom.   

Abstract

It is unclear whether the perceptual segregation of a mistuned harmonic from a periodic complex tone depends specifically on harmonic relations between the other components. A procedure used previously for harmonic complexes [W. M. Hartmann et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1712-1724 (1990)] was adapted and extended to regular inharmonic complexes. On each trial, subjects heard a 12-component complex followed by a pure tone in a continuous loop. In experiment 1, a mistuning of +/- 4% was applied to one of the components 2-11. The complex was either harmonic, frequency shifted, or spectrally stretched. Subjects adjusted the pure tone to match the pitch of the mistuned component. Near matches were taken to indicate segregation, and were almost as frequent in the inharmonic conditions as in the harmonic case. Also, small but consistent mismatches, pitch shifts, were found in all conditions. These were similar in direction and size to earlier findings for harmonic complexes. Using a range of mistunings, experiment 2 showed that the segregation of components from regular inharmonic complexes could be sensitive to mistunings of 1.5% or less. These findings are consistent with the proposal that aspects of spectral regularity other than harmonic relations can also influence auditory grouping.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10491697     DOI: 10.1121/1.423771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Inharmonicity detection. Effects of age and contralateral distractor sounds.

Authors:  Manon Grube; D Yves von Cramon; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Does fundamental-frequency discrimination measure virtual pitch discrimination?

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Kristin Divis; David M Wrobleski; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Recovering sound sources from embedded repetition.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; David Wrobleski; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to double harmonic tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Spectral processing and sound source determination.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.230

7.  Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Further evidence that fundamental-frequency difference limens measure pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Claire M Ryan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 10.  Subcortical pathways: Towards a better understanding of auditory disorders.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Boris Gourévitch; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.