Literature DB >> 10489263

Conditioning method dramatically alters the role of amygdala in taste aversion learning.

G E Schafe1, T E Thiele, I L Bernstein.   

Abstract

Although an important role for the amygdala in taste aversion learning has been suggested by work in a number of laboratories, results have been inconsistent and interpretations varied. The present series of studies reevaluated the role of the amygdala in taste aversion learning by examining the extent to which conditioning methods, testing methods and lesioning methods, influence whether amygdala lesions dramatically affect conditioned taste aversion (CTA) learning. Results indicated that when animals are conditioned with an intraoral (I/O) taste presentation, lesions of amygdala eliminate evidence of conditioning whether animals are tested intraorally or with a two-bottle solution presentation. Dramatic effects of amygdala lesions on CTA learning were seen whether lesions were made electrolytically or using an excitotoxin. In contrast, when animals were conditioned using bottle presentation of the taste, electrolytic lesions attenuated CTAs but did not eliminate them, and excitotoxic lesions had no effect. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that neural structures critical for CTA learning may differ depending on the extent to which the method of conditioned stimulus delivery incorporates a response component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10489263      PMCID: PMC311265     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  31 in total

1.  Transient expression of c-Fos in rat amygdala during training is required for encoding conditioned taste aversion memory.

Authors:  R Lamprecht; Y Dudai
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Rat gustatory memory requires protein kinase C activity in the amygdala and cortical gustatory area.

Authors:  Y Yasoshima; T Yamamoto
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-04-14       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on neophobia, learned taste aversions, and sodium appetite in rats.

Authors:  M Nachman; J H Ashe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-10

4.  Cortical substrates of taste aversion learning: involvement of dorsolateral amygdaloid nuclei and temporal neocortex in taste aversion learning.

Authors:  P S Lasiter; D L Glanzman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Cortical substrates of taste aversion learning: dorsal prepiriform (insular) lesions disrupt taste aversion learning.

Authors:  P S Lasiter; D L Glanzman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1982-06

6.  Chronically decerebrate rats demonstrate satiation but not bait shyness.

Authors:  H J Grill; R Norgren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat.

Authors:  J Garcia; W G Hankins; K W Rusiniak
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on taste aversions produced by lactose and lithium chloride in the rat.

Authors:  L C Simbayi; R A Boakes; M J Burton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  cAMP response element-binding protein in the amygdala is required for long- but not short-term conditioned taste aversion memory.

Authors:  R Lamprecht; S Hazvi; Y Dudai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Taste agnosia following gustatory neocortex ablation: dissociation from odor and generality across taste qualities.

Authors:  S W Kiefer; L R Leach; J J Braun
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  22 in total

1.  Taste neophobia and c-Fos expression in the rat brain.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Chris Roman; Joe Arthurs; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Latent inhibition of conditioned disgust reactions in rats.

Authors:  Matías López; Patricia Gasalla; Mercedes Vega; Cheryl L Limebeer; Erin M Rock; Katharine J Tuerke; Holly Bedard; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Temporary basolateral amygdala lesions disrupt acquisition of socially transmitted food preferences in rats.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; Alfredo Fontanini; Donald B Katz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Development switch in neural circuitry underlying odor-malaise learning.

Authors:  Kiseko Shionoya; Stephanie Moriceau; Lauren Lunday; Cathrine Miner; Tania L Roth; Regina M Sullivan
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Hippocampal inactivation enhances taste learning.

Authors:  Martha E Stone; Brandon S Grimes; Donald B Katz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Amount of training and cue-evoked taste-reactivity responding in reinforcer devaluation.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Heather Lasseter; Isha Agarwal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-01

7.  Identification of flap structure-specific endonuclease 1 as a factor involved in long-term memory formation of aversive learning.

Authors:  Lorena Saavedra-Rodríguez; Adrinel Vázquez; Humberto G Ortiz-Zuazaga; Nataliya E Chorna; Fernando A González; Lissette Andrés; Karen Rodríguez; Fernando Ramírez; Alan Rodríguez; Sandra Peña de Ortiz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Area postrema lesions attenuate LiCl-induced c-Fos expression correlated with conditioned taste aversion learning.

Authors:  Corinne M Spencer; Lisa A Eckel; Rahel Nardos; Thomas A Houpt
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-08-24

9.  Corticosterone influences on Mammalian neonatal sensitive-period learning.

Authors:  Stephanie Moriceau; Regina M Sullivan
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 10.  Taste avoidance and taste aversion: evidence for two different processes.

Authors:  Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.