BACKGROUND: Interpretation of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies is hampered by attenuation artifacts. Attenuation correction methods with simultaneous emission and transmission are now commercially available. However, it has been observed in clinical practice that attenuation correction without down-scatter correction in a 1-day rest/stress myocardial perfusion protocol may lead to serious interpretation errors. Therefore the aim of this study was to study errors resulting from down-scatter under realistic conditions, thus providing a background for the assessment of further corrections. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in a 1-day technetium 99m-tetrofosmin rest-stress SPECT protocol, with a moving 153Gd line-source device for attenuation correction without down-scatter correction. Short-axis slices were quantified as inferior/anterior, septal/lateral, and apical/remainder count ratios. The changes at rest (350 MBq) and exercise (900 MBq) induced by attenuation correction were studied. Attenuation correction gave differences in apparent perfusion between rest and exercise not seen before correction. The gender differences in inferior-anterior ratio were greatly reduced after correction at rest but remained at exercise. A torso phantom study indicated that these results were due to under-correction at exercise because of down-scatter. CONCLUSIONS: Down-scatter results in an underestimation of attenuation in simultaneous emission and transmission, if not accurately accounted for. Particularly, a high-dose study compared with a low-dose study, as in the 1-day protocol, might cause serious interpretation errors.
BACKGROUND: Interpretation of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies is hampered by attenuation artifacts. Attenuation correction methods with simultaneous emission and transmission are now commercially available. However, it has been observed in clinical practice that attenuation correction without down-scatter correction in a 1-day rest/stress myocardial perfusion protocol may lead to serious interpretation errors. Therefore the aim of this study was to study errors resulting from down-scatter under realistic conditions, thus providing a background for the assessment of further corrections. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in a 1-day technetium 99m-tetrofosmin rest-stress SPECT protocol, with a moving 153Gd line-source device for attenuation correction without down-scatter correction. Short-axis slices were quantified as inferior/anterior, septal/lateral, and apical/remainder count ratios. The changes at rest (350 MBq) and exercise (900 MBq) induced by attenuation correction were studied. Attenuation correction gave differences in apparent perfusion between rest and exercise not seen before correction. The gender differences in inferior-anterior ratio were greatly reduced after correction at rest but remained at exercise. A torso phantom study indicated that these results were due to under-correction at exercise because of down-scatter. CONCLUSIONS: Down-scatter results in an underestimation of attenuation in simultaneous emission and transmission, if not accurately accounted for. Particularly, a high-dose study compared with a low-dose study, as in the 1-day protocol, might cause serious interpretation errors.
Authors: M A King; W Xia; D J deVries; T S Pan; B J Villegas; S Dahlberg; B M Tsui; M H Ljungberg; H T Morgan Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1996 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: X Kang; D S Berman; K F Van Train; A M Amanullah; J Areeda; J D Friedman; H Kiat; G Germano Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: K F Van Train; J Areeda; E V Garcia; C D Cooke; J Maddahi; H Kiat; G Germano; G Silagan; R Folks; D S Berman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1993-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: K F Van Train; E V Garcia; J Maddahi; J Areeda; C D Cooke; H Kiat; G Silagan; R Folks; J Friedman; L Matzer Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Robert C Hendel; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; E Gordon DePuey; Ernest V Garcia; Timothy M Bateman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: B Hesse; K Tägil; A Cuocolo; C Anagnostopoulos; M Bardiés; J Bax; F Bengel; E Busemann Sokole; G Davies; M Dondi; L Edenbrandt; P Franken; A Kjaer; J Knuuti; M Lassmann; M Ljungberg; C Marcassa; P Y Marie; F McKiddie; M O'Connor; E Prvulovich; R Underwood; B van Eck-Smit Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Yasmin Masood; Yi-Hwa Liu; Gordon Depuey; Raymond Taillefer; Luis I Araujo; Steven Allen; Dominique Delbeke; Frank Anstett; Aharon Peretz; Mary-Jo Zito; Vera Tsatkin; Frans J Th Wackers Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Alexander G Pitman; Victor Kalff; Bruce Van Every; Borghild Risa; Leighton R Barnden; Michael J Kelly Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.952