Literature DB >> 1041590

Evaluation of the pathotec Rapid I-D system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

P B Smith, D L Rhoden, K M Tomfohrde.   

Abstract

The PathoTec Rapid I-D System for identifying Enterobacteriaceae was evaluated with 471 cultures. In 4,910 individual test comparisons, 95.5% of the results agreed, with results of only two test strips, those for esculin hydrolysis and urease production, agreeing with conventional tests in less than 94% of the trials. The PathoTec system exhibited 94.3% accuracy in identifying these cultures in a double-blind study with conventional media and procedures as the alternate system. Two newly developed test strips, for 0-nitrophenyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside and ornithine decarboxylase, were found to be highly reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1041590      PMCID: PMC275092          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.1.4.359-362.1975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the PathoTec "Rapid I-D System".

Authors:  D J Blazevic; P C Schreckenberger; J M Matsen
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-12

2.  Evaluation of the PathoTec "Rapid I-D System" and two additional Experimental reagent-impregnated paper strips.

Authors:  R Rosner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-12

3.  Evaluation of reagent-impregnated strips for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  W J Martin; S F Bartes; M M Ball
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1971-03

4.  Comparative study of the efficacy of seven paper-reagent strips and conventional biochemical tests in identifying gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  J M Matsen; J C Sherris
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-09
  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  Direct inoculation procedure for the rapid classification of bacteria from blood culture.

Authors:  S C Edberg; M Novak; H Slater; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  API computer profiles: correlation of API 20E with API 10S.

Authors:  S B Phillips; D Amsterdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of miniaturized multitest systems with conventional methodology for identification of Enterobacteriaceae from foods.

Authors:  L S Guthertz; R L Okoluk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Esculin hydrolysis by Gram positive bacteria. A rapid test and it's comparison with other methods.

Authors:  S M Qadri; J C Smith; S Zubairi; M I DeSilva
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Rapid tests for esculin hydrolysis by anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S M Qadri; S Johnson
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  Comparison of spot esculin hydrolysis with the PathoTec strip test for rapid differentiation of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S M Qadri; S Johnson; J C Smith; S Zubairi; R L Gillum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Simplified scheme for identification of prompt lactose-fermenting members of the Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M J Hicks; K J Ryan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Sodium chloride-esculin hydrolysis test for rapid identification of enterococci.

Authors:  S M Qadri; D J Flournoy; S G Qadri
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Rapid spot test for the determination of esculin hydrolysis.

Authors:  S C Edberg; K Gam; C J Bottenbley; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.