Literature DB >> 6783825

Esculin hydrolysis by Gram positive bacteria. A rapid test and it's comparison with other methods.

S M Qadri, J C Smith, S Zubairi, M I DeSilva.   

Abstract

A number of bacteria hydrolyze esculin enzymatically to esculetin. This characteristic is used by taxonomists and clinical microbiologists in the differentiation and identification of bacteria, especially to distinguish Lance-field group D streptococci from non-group D organisms and Listeria monocytogenes from morphologically similar Erysipelothrix rhusipoathiae and diphtheroids. Conventional methods used for esculin hydrolysis require 4--48 h for completion. We developed and evaluated a medium which gives positive results more rapidly. The 2,330 isolates used in this study consisted of 1,680 esculin positive and 650 esculin negative organisms. The sensitivity and specificity of this method were compared with the PathoTec esculin hydrolysis strip and the procedure of Vaughn and Levine (VL). Of the 1,680 esculin positive organisms, 97% gave positive reactions within 30 minutes with the rapid test whereas PathoTec required 3--4 h incubation for the same number of organisms to yield a positive reaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6783825     DOI: 10.1007/BF02171773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0300-8584            Impact factor:   3.402


  15 in total

1.  Presumptive identification of enterococci from other D streptococci by a rapid sodium chloride tolerance test.

Authors:  S M Qadri; M J deSilva; S G Qadri; A Villarreal
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Tetrazolium reduction as a means of differentiating Streptococcus faecalis from Streptococcus faecium.

Authors:  E M BARNES
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1956-02

3.  Some observations on the classification of enterococci.

Authors:  N C Graham; E O Bartley
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1939-09

4.  Evaluation of the pathotec Rapid I-D system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P B Smith; D L Rhoden; K M Tomfohrde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Differentiation of the "Intermediate" Coli-Like Bacteria.

Authors:  R H Vaughn; M Levine
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1942-10       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Comparative Study of Presumptive and Confirmative Media for Bacteria of the Coliform Group and for Fecal Streptococci.

Authors:  A A Hajna; C A Perry
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1943-05

7.  Presumptive identification of group A, B, and D streptococci on agar plate media.

Authors:  R R Facklam; J F Padula; E C Wortham; R C Cooksey; H A Rountree
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Identification and significance of Streptococcus agalactiae (Lancefield group B).

Authors:  H Braunstein; E B Tucker; B C Gibson
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 9.  Media and methods for isolation and enumeration of the enterococci.

Authors:  P A Hartman; G W Reinbold; D S Saraswat
Journal:  Adv Appl Microbiol       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 5.086

10.  Rapid spot test for the determination of esculin hydrolysis.

Authors:  S C Edberg; K Gam; C J Bottenbley; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.