Literature DB >> 7016896

Comparison of spot esculin hydrolysis with the PathoTec strip test for rapid differentiation of anaerobic bacteria.

S M Qadri, S Johnson, J C Smith, S Zubairi, R L Gillum.   

Abstract

The ability of several anaerobic bacteria to hydrolyze esculin to esculetin is used by clinical microbiologists and taxonomists in the differentiation and identification of both gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms. Conventional methods used for determining esculin hydrolysis by anaerobic bacteria require 24 to 48 h for completion. In this paper we evaluate two procedures which yield rapid results. A total of 738 anaerobic bacteria were used in this study. A total of 99% of the esculin-hydrolyzing anaerobic bacteria gave positive results with the spot test in 1 h, whereas the other test method, the PathoTec strip test (General Diagnostics, Morris Plains, N.J.), required 4 h for 96% of the strains tested to yield positive reactions. Both tests showed a 100% specificity when compared with the standard broth test and are easy to perform, accurate, and economical. The spot test is superior to the PathoTec strip test in yielding results more rapidly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7016896      PMCID: PMC273814          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.459-462.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

Review 1.  THE GROUP D STREPTOCOCCI.

Authors:  R H DEIBEL
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1964-09

2.  Evaluation of the pathotec Rapid I-D system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P B Smith; D L Rhoden; K M Tomfohrde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Differentiation of the "Intermediate" Coli-Like Bacteria.

Authors:  R H Vaughn; M Levine
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1942-10       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Comparative Study of Presumptive and Confirmative Media for Bacteria of the Coliform Group and for Fecal Streptococci.

Authors:  A A Hajna; C A Perry
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1943-05

5.  Presumptive identification of group A, B, and D streptococci on agar plate media.

Authors:  R R Facklam; J F Padula; E C Wortham; R C Cooksey; H A Rountree
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Listeria monocytogenes and listeric infections.

Authors:  M L Gray; A H Killinger
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1966-06

7.  Comparison of several laboratory media for presumptive identification of enterococci and group D streptococci.

Authors:  R R Facklam
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-08

8.  Rapid spot test for the determination of esculin hydrolysis.

Authors:  S C Edberg; K Gam; C J Bottenbley; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Esculin hydrolysis by Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  S C Edberg; S Pittman; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Laboratory studies with a selective Enterococcus medium.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; D Goldberg; J Sampson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-09
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile Ribotype 023 Lacks the Ability To Hydrolyze Esculin, Leading to False-Negative Results on Chromogenic Agar.

Authors:  Mairéad C Connor; Derek J Fairley; James P McKenna; Nikki J Marks; John W McGrath
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid tests for esculin hydrolysis by anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S M Qadri; S Johnson
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.271

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.