Literature DB >> 10396624

Can subretinal microphotodiodes successfully replace degenerated photoreceptors?

E Zrenner1, A Stett, S Weiss, R B Aramant, E Guenther, K Kohler, K D Miliczek, M J Seiler, H Haemmerle.   

Abstract

The idea of implanting microphotodiode arrays as visual prostheses has aroused controversy on its feasibility from the moment it appeared in print. We now present results which basically support the concept of replacing damaged photoreceptors with subretinally implanted stimulation devices. Network activity in degenerated rat retinae could be modulated through local electrical stimulation in vitro. We also investigated the long term stability and biocompatibility of the subretinal implants and their impact on retinal physiology in rats. Ganzfeld electroretinograms and histology showed no significant side effect of subretinal implants on retinal function or the architecture of the inner retina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10396624     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00312-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  46 in total

1.  Visual evoked potentials to infrared stimulation in normal cats and rats.

Authors:  M T Pardue; S L Ball; J R Hetling; V Y Chow; A Y Chow; N S Peachey
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Towards the cortical representation of form and motion stimuli generated by a retina implant.

Authors:  Thomas Schanze; Nina Greve; Lutz Hesse
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  In vivo assessment of subretinally implanted microphotodiode arrays in cats by optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography.

Authors:  Michael Völker; Kei Shinoda; Helmut Sachs; Helmut Gmeiner; Thorsten Schwarz; Konrad Kohler; Werner Inhoffen; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Eberhart Zrenner; Florian Gekeler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Optical energy transfer for intraocular microsystems studied in rabbits.

Authors:  Thomas Laube; Claudia Brockmann; Rüdiger Buss; Carsten Lau; Kerstin Höck; Natalie Stawski; Thomas Stieglitz; Horst A Richter; Harald Schilling
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Retinal safety of near infrared radiation in photovoltaic restoration of sight.

Authors:  H Lorach; J Wang; D Y Lee; R Dalal; P Huie; D Palanker
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  [Ocular electrical stimulation: Therapeutic application and active retinal implants for hereditary retinal degenerations].

Authors:  F Gekeler; E Zrenner; K U Bartz-Schmidt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Subretinal electrode implantation in the P23H rat for chronic stimulations.

Authors:  J Salzmann; O P Linderholm; J-L Guyomard; M Paques; M Simonutti; M Lecchi; J Sommerhalder; E Dubus; M Pelizzone; D Bertrand; J Sahel; P Renaud; A B Safran; S Picaud
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 8.  Artificial means for restoring vision.

Authors:  Parwez Hossain; Ian W Seetho; Andrew C Browning; Winfried M Amoaku
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-01

9.  Subretinal implantation and testing of polyimide film electrodes in cats.

Authors:  Helmut G Sachs; Thomas Schanze; Marcus Wilms; Andreas Rentzos; Ursula Brunner; Florian Gekeler; Lutz Hesse
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Holographic display system for restoration of sight to the blind.

Authors:  G A Goetz; Y Mandel; R Manivanh; D V Palanker; T Čižmár
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.