Literature DB >> 26319085

[Ocular electrical stimulation: Therapeutic application and active retinal implants for hereditary retinal degenerations].

F Gekeler1,2, E Zrenner3, K U Bartz-Schmidt3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation has a long history in ophthalmology. Subthreshold electrical stimulation can have beneficial therapeutic effects on hereditary degenerative retinal diseases. Suprathreshold stimulation is able to elicit visual perceptions and, if multielectrode fields are arranged as an array, usable pictures can be perceived by blind patients.
OBJECTIVES: This is a review article on the current situation and studies on therapeutic transcorneal electrical stimulation. Moreover, the challenges, surgical concepts and visual results of active retinal implants are discussed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This article gives an overview on transcorneal electrical stimulation and active retinal implants based on published results, with special emphasis on the clinical application.
RESULTS: The results of initial controlled studies on therapeutic transcorneal electrical stimulation in hereditary retinal diseases were very promising. The largest controlled study so far in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) has yielded many positive trends and some significant improvements in electrophysiological data. Currently, two retinal implants have regulatory approval, the Argus II retinal prosthesis system® (SecondSight®) and the Alpha-IMS© (Retina Implant AG). Both systems can be used to improve visual perception and under test conditions can achieve visual acuities of 0.02 and 0.04, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In-depth analyses and follow-up studies in larger patient groups are currently planned to definitively clarify the potential of therapeutic transcorneal electrical stimulation in RP patients. The challenges of currently available active retinal implants are the technical biostability and the limited spatial resolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrostimulation; Implant; Retina; Retinitis pigmentosa; Transcorneal electrical stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26319085     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-015-0126-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  26 in total

1.  Transcorneal electrical stimulation promotes the survival of photoreceptors and preserves retinal function in royal college of surgeons rats.

Authors:  Takeshi Morimoto; Takashi Fujikado; Jun-Sub Choi; Hiroyuki Kanda; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Yutaka Fukuda; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Retinal expression of Fgf2 in RCS rats with subretinal microphotodiode array.

Authors:  Vincent T Ciavatta; Moon Kim; Paul Wong; John M Nickerson; R Keith Shuler; George Y McLean; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Transcorneal electrical stimulation for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled exploratory study.

Authors:  Andreas Schatz; Tobias Röck; Lubka Naycheva; Gabriel Willmann; Barbara Wilhelm; Tobias Peters; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Eberhart Zrenner; André Messias; Florian Gekeler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  [Development of an epiretinal prosthesis for stimulation of the human retina].

Authors:  M Feucht; T Laube; N Bornfeld; P Walter; M Velikay-Parel; R Hornig; G Richard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Effect of transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy or traumatic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Takashi Fujikado; Takeshi Morimoto; Kenji Matsushita; Hiroshi Shimojo; Yoshitaka Okawa; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Neuroprotective effect of subretinal implants in the RCS rat.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Michael J Phillips; Hang Yin; Brian D Sippy; Sarah Webb-Wood; Alan Y Chow; Sherry L Ball
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode.

Authors:  C Veraart; C Raftopoulos; J T Mortimer; J Delbeke; D Pins; G Michaux; A Vanlierde; S Parrini; M C Wanet-Defalque
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-11-30       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Evaluation of residual retinal function by pupillary constrictions and phosphenes using transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Takeshi Morimoto; Takehiro Fukui; Kenji Matsushita; Yoshitaka Okawa; Hiroshi Shimojyo; Shunji Kusaka; Yasuo Tano; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Neuroprotective effect of transretinal electrical stimulation on neurons in the inner nuclear layer of the degenerated retina.

Authors:  Heiko Schmid; Thoralf Herrmann; Konrad Kohler; Alfred Stett
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS.

Authors:  Katarina Stingl; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Dorothea Besch; Angelika Braun; Anna Bruckmann; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Stephanie Hipp; Gernot Hörtdörfer; Christoph Kernstock; Assen Koitschev; Akos Kusnyerik; Helmut Sachs; Andreas Schatz; Krunoslav T Stingl; Tobias Peters; Barbara Wilhelm; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  1 in total

1.  Specvis: Free and open-source software for visual field examination.

Authors:  Piotr Dzwiniel; Mateusz Gola; Anna Wójcik-Gryciuk; Wioletta J Waleszczyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.