Literature DB >> 10386849

Within-patient longitudinal speech reception measures with continuous interleaved sampling processors for ineraid implanted subjects.

M Pelizzone1, G Cosendai, J Tinembart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess within-subject changes in speech reception over time in a group of Ineraid subjects fitted with continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) wearable processors fabricated in Geneva. To compare asymptotic performance between CIS and Ineraid processors for the same subjects.
DESIGN: Twelve patients, all users of the 4-channel Ineraid cochlear implant system for several years and with no previous experience of CIS processors in daily life, were equipped with Geneva Wearable Processors programmed to implement a high-rate CIS sound processing strategy using four to six channels. Their speech reception performance with CIS processors was monitored over a period of 1 yr with consonant and vowel identification tests. For comparison, speech reception performance also was measured with Ineraid processors before switching to CIS and after 6 mo of non-use of Ineraid processors.
RESULTS: At fitting, CIS processors produced significantly better consonant identification but no better vowel identification. Subsequently, consonant and vowel scores with CIS processors improved progressively to asymptote after 6 mo of daily use. At 6 mo and beyond, performance with CIS processors was significantly superior to that obtained with Ineraid processors on both consonant and vowel identification tests. Control tests made with Ineraid processors after 6 mo of non-use of the device yielded results that were indistinguishable from those obtained before the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The full potential of the CIS strategy is not revealed at fitting. Accumulation of daily experience provides significant improvements, asymptotic performance being reached after about 4 to 6 mo of use. All Ineraid users might greatly benefit from CIS processors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10386849     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199906000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  7 in total

1.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Computer-Assisted Speech Training for Cochlear Implant Patients: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2007-05-01

6.  The smaller the frequency-to-place mismatch the better the hearing outcomes in cochlear implant recipients?

Authors:  Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning; Olivier Vanderveken; Vedat Topsakal; Vincent Van Rompaey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.

Authors:  Benjamin Krüger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.