Literature DB >> 10371456

The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI.

M R Elliott1, R W Bowtell, P G Morris.   

Abstract

The potentially important effect of gradient switching sound on brain function during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was studied by comparing experiments with low and high scanner sound levels. To provide a low sound level experiment, a sparse scanning method was used, characterized by long, 9 sec, periods of scanner silence interspersed with 1 sec echoplanar imaging (EPI) bursts. For the condition with high sound levels, extra EPI gradient modules were inserted in the 9 sec inter-image intervals. Visual, motor, or auditory stimuli were presented in the interval between imaging. It was found that with the addition of gradient sounds, auditory activation was significantly decreased while motor and visual activation were not significantly altered. Other general factors relating to fMRI were also examined, such as experimental duration and fatigue. For example, motion of the subjects during the experiments was found to be related to the time spent in the scanner, rather than to the ambient sound level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10371456     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199906)41:6<1230::aid-mrm20>3.0.co;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  26 in total

1.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modulation and task effects in auditory processing measured using fMRI.

Authors:  D A Hall; M P Haggard; M A Akeroyd; A Q Summerfield; A R Palmer; M R Elliott; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: an event-related fMRI study employing overt responses.

Authors:  G I de Zubicaray; S J Wilson; K L McMahon; S Muthiah
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Piotr A Wielopolski; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Sparse imaging and continuous event-related fMRI in the visual domain: a systematic comparison.

Authors:  Katharina Nebel; Philipp Stude; Holger Wiese; Bernhard Müller; Armin de Greiff; Michael Forsting; Hans-Christoph Diener; Matthias Keidel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; E C Caparelli; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Effect of fMRI acoustic noise on non-auditory working memory task: comparison between continuous and pulsed sound emitting EPI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch; Ernst W Radue; Markus Klarhöfer; Erich Seifritz; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.