OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to quantitatively evaluate calcified atherosclerotic burden in the cervical carotid arteries using MDCT to determine the relationship of scores with luminal stenosis and symptomatology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Calcium plaque volume was measured in 106 cervical carotid arteries (53 patients) using MDCT angiography. The study group included 32 asymptomatic patients (mean age, 70.2 +/- 8.7 [SD] years; 15 women, 17 men) and 21 patients with ischemic neurologic symptoms (69.6 +/- 12.9 years; eight women, 13 men). By vessel, there were 43 high-grade stenotic (> or = 60% by North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial [NASCET] criteria), 15 moderate-grade stenotic (30-59%), and 44 mild-grade stenotic or normal (0-29%) vessels, with four excluded for prior carotid endarterectomy. Volume scores were calculated by summing the area of calcium in the common and extracranial internal carotid arteries on axial slices and multiplying by the slice increment. RESULTS: Controlling for cardiovascular risk factors and luminal stenosis, we found that scores were significantly related to the occurrence of symptoms (p = 0.003). Even with patient age as a covariant, patients with high-grade stenosis had significantly higher scores than those without high-grade disease (p = 0.004). Moreover, quantitative burden was associated with luminal stenosis on adjusted multivariate analysis (p = 0.034). The specificity and positive predictive value for high-grade luminal narrowing were notably lower on individual vessel analysis than on total score analysis, likely secondary to variability in vascular remodeling. CONCLUSION: Calcium scores in the cervical carotid arteries may represent an independent marker for luminal stenosis and ischemic symptoms. A prospective longitudinal study examining calcium levels and morbidity may be warranted to examine whether burden has a role in risk stratification.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to quantitatively evaluate calcified atherosclerotic burden in the cervical carotid arteries using MDCT to determine the relationship of scores with luminal stenosis and symptomatology. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Calcium plaque volume was measured in 106 cervical carotid arteries (53 patients) using MDCT angiography. The study group included 32 asymptomatic patients (mean age, 70.2 +/- 8.7 [SD] years; 15 women, 17 men) and 21 patients with ischemic neurologic symptoms (69.6 +/- 12.9 years; eight women, 13 men). By vessel, there were 43 high-grade stenotic (> or = 60% by North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial [NASCET] criteria), 15 moderate-grade stenotic (30-59%), and 44 mild-grade stenotic or normal (0-29%) vessels, with four excluded for prior carotid endarterectomy. Volume scores were calculated by summing the area of calcium in the common and extracranial internal carotid arteries on axial slices and multiplying by the slice increment. RESULTS: Controlling for cardiovascular risk factors and luminal stenosis, we found that scores were significantly related to the occurrence of symptoms (p = 0.003). Even with patient age as a covariant, patients with high-grade stenosis had significantly higher scores than those without high-grade disease (p = 0.004). Moreover, quantitative burden was associated with luminal stenosis on adjusted multivariate analysis (p = 0.034). The specificity and positive predictive value for high-grade luminal narrowing were notably lower on individual vessel analysis than on total score analysis, likely secondary to variability in vascular remodeling. CONCLUSION:Calcium scores in the cervical carotid arteries may represent an independent marker for luminal stenosis and ischemic symptoms. A prospective longitudinal study examining calcium levels and morbidity may be warranted to examine whether burden has a role in risk stratification.
Authors: Cheng Hong; Christoph R Becker; U Joseph Schoepf; Bernd Ohnesorge; Roland Bruening; Maximilian F Reiser Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gregory W Albers; Louis R Caplan; J Donald Easton; Pierre B Fayad; J P Mohr; Jeffrey L Saver; David G Sherman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-11-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jennifer L Hunt; Ronald Fairman; Marc E Mitchell; Jeffrey P Carpenter; Michael Golden; Tigran Khalapyan; Megan Wolfe; David Neschis; Ross Milner; Benjamin Scoll; Anita Cusack; Emile R Mohler Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: George T Kondos; Julie Anne Hoff; Alexander Sevrukov; Martha L Daviglus; Daniel B Garside; Stephen S Devries; Eva V Chomka; Kiang Liu Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-05-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Karsten Pohle; Alexander Leber; Christian Thilo; Andreas Knez; Theresa Menendez; Ralph Maeffert; Magda Kusus; Matthias Regenfus; Andrea Bickel; Ralph Haberl; Gerhard Steinbeck; Werner Moshage; Werner G Daniel Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-08-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John S Ho; John J Cannaday; Carolyn E Barlow; Dale B Reinhardt; Wendy A Wade Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-11-20 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Kiran R Nandalur; Andrew D Hardie; Prashant Raghavan; Matthew J Schipper; Erol Baskurt; Christopher M Kramer Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Nikola Gotovac; Ivana Išgum; Max A Viergever; Geert J Biessels; Josip Fajdić; Birgitta K Velthuis; Mathias Prokop Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jong Kook Rhim; Jin Pyeong Jeon; Jeong Jin Park; Hyuk Jai Choi; Young Dae Cho; Seung Hun Sheen; Kyung-Sool Jang Journal: Neurointervention Date: 2016-09-03
Authors: Lorenzo Mannelli; Lee M Mitsumori; Marina Ferguson; Dongxiang Xu; Baocheng Chu; Kelley R Branch; William P Shuman; Chun Yuan Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 5.315