Literature DB >> 17416828

Efficacy and sensitivity of axial scans and different reconstruction methods in the study of the ulcerated carotid plaque using multidetector-row CT angiography: comparison with surgical results.

L Saba1, G Caddeo, R Sanfilippo, R Montisci, G Mallarini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Carotid plaque ulceration is an important risk factor for stroke, and its diagnosis may be very important to plan a correct therapeutic approach. We hypothesized that axial scans and various reconstruction methods could have different specificity and sensitivity in the study of plaque ulceration. The object of this study was to evaluate their role and diagnostic efficacy in patients with carotid plaque complicated by ulceration through the comparison with surgical results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2004 to November 2005, 109 patients who underwent a carotid endarterectomy were analyzed using CT angiography for a total of 218 carotid arteries. We assessed every carotid for the presence of ulcerations. For each patient axial image, maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), shaded surface display (SSD), and volume rendering (VR) reconstructions were obtained.
RESULTS: Multidetector row CT angiography (MDCT) found 32 ulcerations; surgical confirmation underlined an overall 93.9% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.858-1.021), and a 98.7% specificity (95% CI, 0.961-1.012). Axial scans and volume rendering images demonstrated the highest sensitivity (90.9% and 87.9%, respectively); SSD, on the contrary, showed the lowest sensitivity: 39.4% (95% CI sensitivity, 0.227-0.561).
CONCLUSION: Axial scans plus VR reconstruction techniques offer superior depiction of carotid plaque ulceration compared with MIP, MPR, and SSD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17416828      PMCID: PMC7977349     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  33 in total

1.  CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods.

Authors:  K A Addis; K D Hopper; T A Iyriboz; Y Liu; S W Wise; C J Kasales; J S Blebea; D T Mauger
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Usefulness of multiplanar reconstructions in evaluation of carotid CT angiography.

Authors:  Roberto Corti; Mario Alerci; Rolf Wyttenbach; Pier Luigi Pedrazzi; Augusto Gallino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Hideki Ota; Kei Takase; Hiroya Rikimaru; Masahiro Tsuboi; Takayuki Yamada; Akihiro Sato; Shuichi Higano; Tadashi Ishibashi; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  J Link; J Brossmann; M Grabener; S Mueller-Huelsbeck; J C Steffens; G Brinkmann; M Heller
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The relationship between the angiographic findings and the clinical features of carotid artery plaque.

Authors:  D I Kim; S J Lee; B B Lee; Y I Kim; C S Chung; D W Seo; K H Lee; Y H Ko; D K Kim; Y S Do; H S Byun
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration. Comparison with surgical observations in a multicenter study. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

Authors:  J Y Streifler; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; O R Benavente; V C Hachinski; G G Ferguson; H J Barnett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest.

Authors:  S Napel; G D Rubin; R B Jeffrey
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Spiral computed tomography: a novel diagnostic approach for investigation of the extracranial cerebral arteries and its complementary role in duplex ultrasonography.

Authors:  R Corti; C Ferrari; M Roberti; M Alerci; P L Pedrazzi; A Gallino
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-09-08       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Carotid plaque gross morphology and clinical presentation: a prospective study of 457 carotid artery specimens.

Authors:  E Ballotta; G Da Giau; L Renon
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Computed tomography angiography for the evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: correlation with histopathology of endarterectomy specimens.

Authors:  Leighton J Walker; Azam Ismail; William McMeekin; David Lambert; A David Mendelow; Daniel Birchall
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  28 in total

1.  Carotid artery wall thickness measured using CT: inter- and intraobserver agreement analysis.

Authors:  L Saba; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; J S Suri; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Vascular wall imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic carotid plaques: current state of the art and potential future of endovascular optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  B A Standish; J Spears; T R Marotta; W Montanera; V X D Yang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  CTA for screening of complicated atherosclerotic carotid plaque--American Heart Association type VI lesions as defined by MRI.

Authors:  M Trelles; K M Eberhardt; M Buchholz; A Schindler; A Bayer-Karpinska; M Dichgans; M F Reiser; K Nikolaou; T Saam
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Computed tomography angiography intraluminal filling defect is predictive of internal carotid artery free-floating thrombus.

Authors:  A Jaberi; C Lum; P Stefanski; R Thornhill; D Iancu; W Petrcich; F Momoli; C Torres; D Dowlatshahi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Assessment of intracranial arterial stenosis with multidetector row CT angiography: a postprocessing techniques comparison.

Authors:  L Saba; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Clinical study of peroneal artery perforators with computed tomographic angiography: implications for fibular flap harvest.

Authors:  Diego Ribuffo; Matteo Atzeni; Luca Saba; Maristella Guerra; Giorgio Mallarini; Ernesto Biagio Proto; Damien Grinsell; Mark W Ashton; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 7.  Intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Ran Meng; Gang Liu; Catherine Cao; Fenghua Chen; Kunlin Jin; Xunming Ji; Guodong Cao
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 8.  Multi-modal CT scanning in the evaluation of cerebrovascular disease patients.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Michele Anzidei; Mario Piga; Federica Ciolina; Lorenzo Mannelli; Carlo Catalano; Jasjit S Suri; Eytan Raz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-06

9.  Magnetic propulsion and ultrasound tracking of endovascular devices.

Authors:  S Tognarelli; V Castelli; G Ciuti; C Di Natali; E Sinibaldi; P Dario; A Menciassi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-12-28

10.  Intraplaque Hemorrhage and the Plaque Surface in Carotid Atherosclerosis: The Plaque At RISK Study (PARISK).

Authors:  A C van Dijk; M T B Truijman; B Hussain; T Zadi; G Saiedie; A A J de Rotte; M I Liem; A F W van der Steen; M J A P Daemen; P J Koudstaal; P J Nederkoorn; J Hendrikse; M E Kooi; A van der Lugt
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.