Literature DB >> 10334746

Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort study.

F Kee1, R H Wilson, C Harper, C C Patterson, K McCallion, R F Houston, R J Moorehead, J M Sloan, B J Rowlands.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinician or hospital caseload affects mortality from colorectal cancer.
DESIGN: Cohort study of cases ascertained between 1990 and 1994 by a region-wide colorectal cancer register. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality within a median follow up period of 54 months after diagnosis.
RESULTS: Of the 3217 new patients registered over the period, 1512 (48%) died before 31 December 1996. Strong predictors of survival both in a logistic regression (fixed follow up) and in a Cox's proportional hazards model (variable follow up) were Duke's stage, the degree of tumour differentiation, whether the liver was deemed clear of cancer by the surgeon at operation, and the type of intervention (elective or emergency and curative or palliative intent). In a multilevel model, surgeon's caseload had no significant effect on mortality at 2 years. Hospital workload, however, had a significant impact on survival. The odds ratio for death within 2 years for cases managed in a hospital with a caseload of between 33 and 46 cases per year, 47 and 54 cases per year, and >/=55 cases per year (compared to one with </=23 cases per year) were respectively 1.48 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.13), 1.52 (1.08 to 2.13), and 1.18 (0.83 to 1.68).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no detectable caseload effect for surgeons managing colorectal cancer, but survival of patients treated in hospitals with caseloads above 33 cases per year was slightly worse than for those treated in hospitals with fewer caseloads. Imprecise measurement of clinician specific "events rates" and the lack of routinely collected case mix data present major challenges for clinical audit and governance in the years ahead.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10334746      PMCID: PMC27880          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  14 in total

1.  Changing site distribution of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Kee; R H Wilson; R Gilliland; J M Sloan; B J Rowlands; R J Moorehead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-18

2.  Outcome-based equity in the treatment of colon cancer patients in Finland.

Authors:  M Hakama; S Karjalainen; T Hakulinen
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display.

Authors:  J Lovegrove; O Valencia; T Treasure; C Sherlaw-Johnson; S Gallivan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-18       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling.

Authors:  C L Christiansen; C N Morris
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals.

Authors:  E L Hannan; J F O'Donnell; H Kilburn; H R Bernard; A Yazici
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Variation in outcome of surgical procedures.

Authors:  A Houghton
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Surgeon-related variables and the clinical trial.

Authors:  L P Fielding; S Stewart-Brown; H A Dudley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  H S Luft; J P Bunker; A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival.

Authors:  C S McArdle; D Hole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-22

10.  Effects of surgeon volume and hospital volume on quality of care in hospitals.

Authors:  R G Hughes; S S Hunt; H S Luft
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  21 in total

1.  Number of cases operated on is important in volume-outcome debate for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Kee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-28

2.  Some patients with colorectal cancer may have been missed by Northern Ireland registry.

Authors:  H Comber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

3.  Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Selwyn O Rogers; Robert E Wolf; Alan M Zaslavsky; William E Wright; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Enzinger; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Sheryl McCoy; Scott A Hundahl; John S Macdonald; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery: a new perspective.

Authors:  Hideo Yasunaga; Yutaka Matsuyama; Kazuhiko Ohe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ya Ruth Huo; Kevin Phan; David L Morris; Winston Liauw
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

7.  Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.

Authors:  E Kuhry; H J Bonjer; E Haglind; W C J Hop; R Veldkamp; M A Cuesta; J Jeekel; L Påhlman; M Morino; A Lacy; S Delgado
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Is cancer care best at high-volume providers?

Authors:  B E Hillner
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Inequalities in survival from colorectal cancer: a comparison of the impact of deprivation, treatment, and host factors on observed and cause specific survival.

Authors:  H Wrigley; P Roderick; S George; J Smith; M Mullee; J Goddard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Can SAPS II predict operative mortality more accurately than POSSUM and P-POSSUM in patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing resection?

Authors:  Mehmet F Can; Gohkan Yagci; Turgut Tufan; Erkan Ozturk; Nazif Zeybek; Sadettin Cetiner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.