Literature DB >> 11489240

Is cancer care best at high-volume providers?

B E Hillner1.   

Abstract

For a variety of medical conditions and procedures, a higher volume-better outcome relationship has been hypothesized for over 25 years. An extensive, consistent body of literature supports a relationship between hospital volume and short-term outcomes for cancers treated with technologically complex surgical procedures. For cancer primarily treated by low-risk surgery, there are few studies. Recent studies found a modest (about 2%) difference in survival benefit between high-volume and low-volume providers associated with colon cancer surgery. Few evaluations in the last 15 years have addressed nonsurgical cancers, eg, lymphomas and testicular cancer. No reports have addressed recurrent or metastatic cancer. Care is better at high-volume providers for a select minority of cancers. Whether provider volume matters in the majority of cancers at the time of presentation has not been evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11489240     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-001-0026-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  26 in total

1.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths.

Authors:  R A Dudley; K L Johansen; R Brand; D J Rennie; A Milstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure.

Authors:  T A Gordon; G P Burleyson; J M Tielsch; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Should HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplants for leukemia be restricted to large centers?

Authors:  M M Horowitz; D Przepiorka; R E Champlin; R P Gale; A Gratwohl; R H Herzig; H G Prentice; A A Rimm; O Ringdén; M M Bortin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G A Porter; C L Soskolne; W W Yakimets; S C Newman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: true association or artefact?

Authors:  A J Sowden; J J Deeks; T A Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-15

7.  Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort study.

Authors:  F Kee; R H Wilson; C Harper; C C Patterson; K McCallion; R F Houston; R J Moorehead; J M Sloan; B J Rowlands
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-22

8.  Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; S J Mulvihill
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-11

9.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Thirty-day mortality rates and cumulative survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  P I Karakiewicz; M Bazinet; A G Aprikian; S Tanguay; M M Elhilali
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.