Literature DB >> 10220929

The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.

A M Williams1, K A Lattal.   

Abstract

The role of the response-reinforcer relation in maintaining operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement was investigated by using a two-operandum (i.e., two-key) procedure with pigeons. Responding on one key was reinforced under a tandem variable-interval differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior (tandem VI DRO) schedule. The schedule defined a resetting unsignaled delay-of-reinforcement procedure in that a response was required when the interfood interval of the VI schedule lapsed, but further responding during the DRO component on either key reset the time interval. This ensured a fixed delay duration between any response and reinforcement. Responding on another key, physically identical to the first one except for spatial location, otherwise was without consequence. The location of the key correlated with the delay-of-reinforcement procedure varied between sessions according to a semirandom sequence. Differences in response rates between the two keys were greater, with proportionally higher rates on the key correlated with the delay-of-reinforcement procedure, the longer the delay-of-reinforcement procedure remained correlated with the same key. Differences in responding on the two keys also increased within individual sessions. These results suggest that the response-reinforcer relation is the primary determinant of responding when responding is acquired and maintained with delayed reinforcement.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10220929      PMCID: PMC1284699          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Experimental control of superstitious responding inhumans.

Authors:  A C CATANIA; D CUTTS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  OVERT "MEDIATING" BEHAVIOR DURING TEMPORALLY SPACED RESPONDING.

Authors:  V G LATIES; B WEISS; R L CLARK; M D REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The stability of operant level and its relation to deprivation.

Authors:  E F SEGAL
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-12

5.  Acquisition of lever-press responding in rats with delayed reinforcement: A comparison of three procedures.

Authors:  J Wilkenfield; M Nickel; E Blakely; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response-reinforcer dependence and independence in multiple and mixed schedules.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Unconditioned response rate of the white rat in a bar-pressing apparatus.

Authors:  W N SCHOENFELD; J J ANTONITIS; P J BERSH
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1950-02

8.  Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; S Gleeson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1990-01

9.  Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement: a comparison of two-lever procedures.

Authors:  G Sutphin; T Byrne; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Dynamics of the reorganization of an operant food-procuring response during an increase in the delay of reinforcement in monkeys.

Authors:  A I Erofeev; G S Belyaeva
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-06

3.  Defining delayed consequences as reinforcers: some do, some don't, and nothing changes.

Authors:  Kelly P Bradley; Alan Poling
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2010

4.  Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  Gregory A Lieving; Mark P Reilly; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Josue Keely; Tyler Feola; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutros; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.