Literature DB >> 2303791

Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.

K A Lattal1, S Gleeson.   

Abstract

Discrete responses of experimentally naive, food-deprived White Carneaux pigeons (key pecks) or Sprague-Dawley rats (bar or omnidirectional lever presses) initiated unsignaled delay periods that terminated with food delivery. Each subject first was trained to eat from the food source, but no attempt was made to shape or to otherwise train the response. In both species, the response developed and was maintained. Control procedures excluded the simple passage of time, response elicitation or induction by food presentation, type of operandum, food delivery device location, and adventitious immediate reinforcement of responding as the basis for the effects. Results revealed that neither training nor immediate reinforcement is necessary to establish new behavior. The conditions that give rise to both the first and second response are discussed, and the results are related to other studies of the delay of reinforcement and to explanations of behavior based on contingency or correlation and contiguity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2303791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  45 in total

1.  The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.

Authors:  A M Williams; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Determinants of reinforcer accumulation during an operant task.

Authors:  J M McFarland; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The development of functional response units: the role of demarcating stimuli.

Authors:  A K Reid; C Z Chadwick; M Dunham; A Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.

Authors:  M A McDevitt; B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Temporal discounting: basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; S H Kollins
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

7.  The effects of behavioral history on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Susan Snycerski; Sean Laraway; Bradley E Huitema; Alan Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Contingency and behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

9.  Humble behaviorism.

Authors:  A Neuringer
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1991

10.  Defining delayed consequences as reinforcers: some do, some don't, and nothing changes.

Authors:  Kelly P Bradley; Alan Poling
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.