Literature DB >> 8454959

Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement.

T S Critchfield1, K A Lattal.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the role of an immediate, response-produced auditory stimulus during acquisition, via delayed reinforcement, of a response selected to control for possible unprogrammed, operandum-related sources of response feedback. Experimentally naive rats were exposed to a delayed-food reinforcement condition, specifically a tandem fixed-ratio 1 differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior 30-s schedule. The response was defined as breaking a photocell beam located near the ceiling at the rear of the operant conditioning chamber. In Experiment 1, rates of photobeam breaking by each rat increased from near zero, regardless of the presence or absence of a tone that immediately followed the response initiating the delay interval. Though not essential, the tone facilitated response acquisition and resulted in more efficient response patterns at stability. Experiment 2 demonstrated that photobeam-breaking response rates under the delayed reinforcement contingency exceeded those in a preceding baseline condition in which no food was delivered. In addition, upon introduction of the delayed reinforcement procedure, correspondence between response patterns and the requirements of the reinforcement schedule increased over baseline levels in the absence of a food contingency. Together with a previous report of Lattal and Gleeson (1990), the present results suggest that response acquisition with delayed reinforcement is a robust phenomenon that may not depend on a mechanically defined response or an immediate external stimulus change to mediate the temporal gap between response and reinforcer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8454959      PMCID: PMC1322049          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  Escape and avoidance conditioning in human subjects without their observation of the response.

Authors:  R F HEFFERLINE; B KEENAN; R A HARFORD
Journal:  Science       Date:  1959-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Response by the rat to environmental change.

Authors:  W N DEMBER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-02

3.  Development of complex, stereotyped behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Signal functions in delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of unsignaled, briefly signaled, and completely signaled delays to reinforcement.

Authors:  D W Schaal; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  "Freezing" Behavior in Rats.

Authors:  H W Nissen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1946-01-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The role of delay of reinforcement in determining reaction potential.

Authors:  F A LOGAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-06

8.  Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; S Gleeson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1990-01

9.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Analysis of longitudinal "time series" data in toxicology.

Authors:  C Cox; D A Cory-Slechta
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1987-02
View more
  20 in total

1.  The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.

Authors:  A M Williams; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.

Authors:  M A McDevitt; B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Dynamics of the reorganization of an operant food-procuring response during an increase in the delay of reinforcement in monkeys.

Authors:  A I Erofeev; G S Belyaeva
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-06

5.  The effects of behavioral history on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Susan Snycerski; Sean Laraway; Bradley E Huitema; Alan Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Defining delayed consequences as reinforcers: some do, some don't, and nothing changes.

Authors:  Kelly P Bradley; Alan Poling
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2010

Review 7.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Acquisition of cocaine self-administration with unsignaled delayed reinforcement in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Chad M Galuska; James H Woods
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Applied implications of current JEAB research on derived relations and delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  S C Hayes; L J Hayes
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993

10.  Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Josue Keely; Tyler Feola; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.