Literature DB >> 16812674

Acquisition of lever-press responding in rats with delayed reinforcement: A comparison of three procedures.

J Wilkenfield, M Nickel, E Blakely, A Poling.   

Abstract

The present study examined the acquisition of lever pressing in rats under three procedures in which food delivery was delayed by 4, 8, and 16 seconds relative to the response. Under the nonresetting delay procedure, food followed the response selected for reinforcement after a specified interval elapsed; responses during this interval had no programmed effect. Under the resetting procedure, the response selected for reinforcement initiated an interval to food delivery that was reset by each subsequent response. Under the stacked delay procedure, every response programmed delivery of food t seconds after its occurrence. Two control groups were studied, one that received food immediately after each lever press and another that never received food. With the exception of the group that did not receive food, responding was established with every procedure at every delay value without autoshaping or shaping. Although responding was established under the resetting delay procedure, response rates were generally not as high as under the other two procedures. These findings support the results of other recent investigations in demonstrating that a response not previously reinforced can be brought to strength by delayed reinforcement in the absence of explicit training.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 16812674      PMCID: PMC1322093          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Delay of reward and performance of an instrumental response.

Authors:  G S HARKER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-05

3.  Response latency as a function of change in delay of reward.

Authors:  J P SEWARD; R J WELDON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-06

4.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

5.  Eliminating behavior with reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of different delay of reinforcement procedures on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  C H Pierce; P V Hanford; J Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Positive reinforcement and the elimination of reinforced responses.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The role of delay of reinforcement in determining reaction potential.

Authors:  F A LOGAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-06

10.  Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; S Gleeson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1990-01
View more
  19 in total

1.  The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.

Authors:  A M Williams; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  The effects of behavioral history on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Susan Snycerski; Sean Laraway; Bradley E Huitema; Alan Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Defining delayed consequences as reinforcers: some do, some don't, and nothing changes.

Authors:  Kelly P Bradley; Alan Poling
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2010

Review 5.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Acquisition of cocaine self-administration with unsignaled delayed reinforcement in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Chad M Galuska; James H Woods
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Josue Keely; Tyler Feola; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Response induction during the acquisition and maintenance of lever pressing with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Rogelio Escobar; Carlos A Bruner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Response acquisition by Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens) with delayed visual reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; B Metzger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of reinforcement rate and delay on the acquisition of lever pressing by rats.

Authors:  C A Bruner; R Avila; L Acuña; L M Gallardo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.