Literature DB >> 10220190

Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model.

J D Bobyn1, K K Toh, S A Hacking, M Tanzer, J J Krygier.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the osseous tissue response to a noncemented metal-backed acetabular component made of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. Eleven dogs with bilateral total hip arthroplasties (22 acetabular implants) were studied for a period of 6 months. Thin section histology, high-resolution radiography, and backscattered scanning electron microscopy revealed that all 22 implants had stable bone-implant interfaces. Regions of bone ingrowth were present in all histologic sections. The depth of bone ingrowth varied from 0.2 mm to the maximal limit of 2 mm. Analyzing contiguous regions of interest across the full bone-implant interface, the mean bone ingrowth for all sections was 16.8% +/- 5.7%. In the peripheral regions of the cup where bone-implant contact was most consistent, bone ingrowth averaged 25.1% +/- 10.1%. The data indicate that the porous tantalum material is effective for biologic fixation in the dog and may provide a suitable alternative to other porous materials used in acetabular cup design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10220190     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90062-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  58 in total

1.  Enhancement of bonding strength by graded structure at interface between apatite layer and bioactive tantalum metal.

Authors:  T Miyazaki; H-M Kim; T Kokubo; C Ohtsuki; H Kato; T Nakamura
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

3.  Radiostereometric analysis study of tantalum compared with titanium acetabular cups and highly cross-linked compared with conventional liners in young patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Authors:  David C Ayers; Meridith Greene; Benjamin Snyder; Michelle Aubin; Jacob Drew; Charles Bragdon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Porous metal for orthopedics implants.

Authors:  Fabrizio Matassi; Alessandra Botti; Luigi Sirleo; Christian Carulli; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-05

5.  Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The development of a scanning strategy for the manufacture of porous biomaterials by selective laser melting.

Authors:  R Stamp; P Fox; W O'Neill; E Jones; C Sutcliffe
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Multicentre use of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component.

Authors:  Th A Xenakis; G A Macheras; K S Stafilas; A T Kostakos; K Bargiotas; K N Malizos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Revision arthroplasty: an update.

Authors:  D Williams; A Taylor; P McLardy-Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Mehdi Jafari; Benjamin Bender; Catelyn Coyle; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  How reverse shoulder arthroplasty works.

Authors:  Matthew Walker; Jordan Brooks; Matthew Willis; Mark Frankle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.