Literature DB >> 10202691

Predictors of compliance with recommended cervical cancer screening schedule: a population-based study.

E J Simoes1, C J Newschaffer, N Hagdrup, F Ali-Abarghoui, X Tao, N Mack, R C Brownson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of routine cervical cancer screening and compliance with screening schedules are low compared to the Year 2000 objectives. Identifying predictors of routine screening and screening schedule compliance will help achieve these objectives.
METHODS: We analyzed data from probability samples of 1,609 Missouri women responding to both the 1994 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the Missouri Enhanced Survey (ES). We generated prevalence odds ratios to identify predictors of non-compliance to cervical cancer screening guidelines. Also, among a sample of women reporting a reason for last Pap test, we estimated the relative odds of a screening v. diagnostic exam.
RESULTS: In the combined probability sample, compliance with screening schedule was likely among women younger than 50 years of age and women who had either a recent mammography or a clinical breast exam. Being African-American, not experiencing a cost barrier when seeking medical care, having at least a high-school education and health coverage were each associated with an increased compliance with a screening schedule in the combined probability sample. Among women in the combined probability sample, whites, those who experienced no cost barrier to seeking medical care, the non-obese, and those who had a recent mammography were each more likely to have had a screening as opposed to a diagnostic exam. DISCUSSION: Cancer control and cardiovascular (CVD) prevention programs should consider jointly targeting those at high risk for cervical cancer and CVD because of aging and associated high-risk behavior such as non-compliance with cervical cancer screening, smoking, and obesity. Also, further research is needed to examine whether the increased compliance with cervical cancer screening guidelines among African American women may be in part due to higher occurrence of diagnostic Pap smears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10202691     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018754307718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  27 in total

1.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in older women: the San Diego Medicare Preventive Health Project.

Authors:  J A Mayer; D J Slymen; J A Drew; B L Wright; J P Elder; S J Williams
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Health promotion in context: the effects of significant others on health behavior change.

Authors:  R S Zimmerman; C Connor
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1989

3.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

4.  Access to cancer screening services for women.

Authors:  B Kirkman-Liff; J J Kronenfeld
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Hysterectomy prevalence and death rates for cervical cancer--United States, 1965-1988.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1992-01-17       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  National trends in the use of preventive health care by women.

Authors:  D M Makuc; V M Freid; J C Kleinman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire: its reliability in a statewide sample.

Authors:  A D Stein; R I Lederman; S Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Reliability of information on chronic disease risk factors collected in the Missouri Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  R C Brownson; J Jackson-Thompson; J C Wilkerson; F Kiani
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Preventive care: do we practice what we preach?

Authors:  N Lurie; W G Manning; C Peterson; G A Goldberg; C A Phelps; L Lillard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The behavioral risk factor surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data.

Authors:  E M Gentry; W D Kalsbeek; G C Hogelin; J T Jones; K L Gaines; M R Forman; J S Marks; F L Trowbridge
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  20 in total

1.  Factors important in promoting cervical cancer screening among Canadian women: findings from the 1996-97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS).

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider; S A Vik
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians.

Authors:  J Kathleen Tracy; Alison D Lydecker; Lynda Ireland
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Factors Associated with Self-Reported Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Aged 18 Years and Older in the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie Miles-Richardson; Shari Allen; Mechelle D Claridy; Elaine Archie Booker; Gemechu Gerbi
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-02

4.  Are obese women more likely to participate in a mobile mammography program?

Authors:  Elvonna Atkins; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Ami Vyas; Sara Jane Gainor; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-04

Review 5.  Assessing the annual economic burden of preventing and treating anogenital human papillomavirus-related disease in the US: analytic framework and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Erik J Dasbach; Elamin H Elbasha
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Psychological benefits of prostate cancer screening: the role of reassurance.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Robert J Volk; Alvah R Cass; Jawaria Gilani; Stephen J Spann
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  The association of obesity and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nisa M Maruthur; Shari D Bolen; Frederick L Brancati; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Perceived access to health care and its influence on the prevalence of behavioral risks among urban African Americans.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Sharada Shankar; Anthony J Alberg
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  FACT-G: reliability and validity of the Malayalam translation.

Authors:  B C Thomas; M Pandey; K Ramdas; P Sebastian; M K Nair
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Cervical cancer screening adherence among HIV-positive female smokers from a comprehensive HIV clinic.

Authors:  Faith E Fletcher; Damon J Vidrine; Irene Tami-Maury; Heather E Danysh; Rachel Marks King; Meredith Buchberg; Roberto C Arduino; Ellen R Gritz
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.