J Kathleen Tracy1, Alison D Lydecker, Lynda Ireland. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA. ktracy@epi.umaryland.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cervical cancer screening practices and barriers to screening in a sample of lesbians. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 225 self-identified lesbians who completed an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 71% reported receiving a Pap screening test in the past 24 months (routine screeners), and 29% reported receiving a Pap screening test >24 months ago or never (nonroutine screeners). Routine screeners were more likely to be older (p < 0.01), white (p = 0.04), and college graduates (p < 0.01) than nonroutine screeners. Nonroutine screeners were more likely to delay seeking healthcare because of fear of discrimination (p < 0.01) and were less likely than routine screeners to disclose orientation to their primary care physician (p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, race, and education, nonroutine screeners perceived fewer benefits from (p < 0.01) and more barriers (p < 0.01) to Pap screening tests and were less knowledgeable about screening guidelines (p < 0.01) than routine screeners, but there was no difference in perceived susceptibility (p = 0.68), perceived seriousness (p = 0.68), or risk factor knowledge (p = 0.35) of cervical cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Many lesbians do not screen for cervical cancer at recommended rates. Nonroutine screeners perceive fewer benefits, more barriers, and more discrimination and are less knowledgeable about screening guidelines than routine screeners.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cervical cancer screening practices and barriers to screening in a sample of lesbians. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 225 self-identified lesbians who completed an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 71% reported receiving a Pap screening test in the past 24 months (routine screeners), and 29% reported receiving a Pap screening test >24 months ago or never (nonroutine screeners). Routine screeners were more likely to be older (p < 0.01), white (p = 0.04), and college graduates (p < 0.01) than nonroutine screeners. Nonroutine screeners were more likely to delay seeking healthcare because of fear of discrimination (p < 0.01) and were less likely than routine screeners to disclose orientation to their primary care physician (p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, race, and education, nonroutine screeners perceived fewer benefits from (p < 0.01) and more barriers (p < 0.01) to Pap screening tests and were less knowledgeable about screening guidelines (p < 0.01) than routine screeners, but there was no difference in perceived susceptibility (p = 0.68), perceived seriousness (p = 0.68), or risk factor knowledge (p = 0.35) of cervical cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Many lesbians do not screen for cervical cancer at recommended rates. Nonroutine screeners perceive fewer benefits, more barriers, and more discrimination and are less knowledgeable about screening guidelines than routine screeners.
Authors: T G Hislop; M Deschamps; C Teh; C Jackson; S P Tu; Y Yasui; S M Schwartz; A Kuniyuki; V Taylor Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2003 Jan-Feb
Authors: Lee S Caplan; David V McQueen; Judith R Qualters; Marilyn Leff; Carol Garrett; Ned Calonge Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Stephen J McPhee; Tung T Nguyen; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Carol Somkin; Phuong Vo; Rena Pasick Journal: Prev Med Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Nubia Muñoz; F Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé; Rolando Herrero; Xavier Castellsagué; Keerti V Shah; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-02-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L Stewart Massad; Xianhong Xie; Howard Minkoff; Teresa M Darragh; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Lorraine Sanchez-Keeland; D Heather Watts; Christine Colie; Howard D Strickler Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Olivier Ferlatte; Travis Salway; Simon Rice; John L Oliffe; Ashleigh J Rich; Rod Knight; Jeffrey Morgan; John S Ogrodniczuk Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2019-07-20
Authors: Madina Agénor; Sarah M Peitzmeier; Allegra R Gordon; Brittany M Charlton; Sebastien Haneuse; Jennifer Potter; S Bryn Austin Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Marievelisse Soto-Salgado; Vivian Colón-López; Cynthia Perez; Cristina Muñoz-Masso; Edmir Marrero; Erick Suárez; Ana P Ortiz Journal: Int J Sex Health Date: 2016-08-22